Skip to content
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

$899k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$814k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$34MHuman Services$118kPhilanthropy$50kArts & Culture$47kEducation$34kReligion$21kFood & Nutrition$7kEnvironment$6k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $873,010, the rows itemized in this filing. The $899,070 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,060 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
  • $250k+1 grant · $814k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$468M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Texas Health Resources Foundation$813,585
Irving Symphony Orchestra$16,350
Crystal Charity Ball$12,500
March of Dimes$10,000
Healing Hands Ministries$7,500
Vickery Meadow Youth Devlp Foundation$6,700
Dallas Arboretum & Botanical Society$6,375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VIOLA'S HOUSE: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 9 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$23M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+11%

Still filing today

89%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $18M · revenue +313% · 59% of their budget
  • DS
    DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $3.1M · revenue +207%
  • TH
    Texas Health Resources Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • DC
    Dallas County Indigent Care
    one grant, 2017 · $8.1M · revenue -100%
  • DC
    DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $2.1M
  • MT
    MUSCULOSKELETAL TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $393k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

Health
2
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
3
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
4
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc

To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
6
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Stephenville

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
7
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Alliance

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
Texas Health Research & Education Institute

Conduct medical research, offer educational programs and undertake development projects that contribute to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease.

Health
9
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
10
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst-Euless-Bedford

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southwest Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
12
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Cleburne

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Healthy Communities; the most unlike its peers is Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $17,644,662 · HealthHEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INCDallas County Indigent Care: $8,094,445 · HealthDallas County Indigent CareDALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION: $3,057,812 · HealthDALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATIONTexas Health Resources Foundation: $1,431,849 · Health+7 more: $1,790,674 · Health+7 moreDALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $2,104,585 · Other+5 more: $112,017 · OtherTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $85,000 · PhilanthropyIrving Symphony Orchestra Association Inc: $47,300 · Arts & CultureVIOLAS HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $6,375 · EnvironmentThe Texas Diversity Council: $5,500 · Education
Health$32,019,442Other$2,216,602Philanthropy$85,000Arts & Culture$47,300Human Services$20,000Environment$6,375Education$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $17,644,662 over 8y, 59% of budgetDallas County Indigent Care: $8,094,445 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetDALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION: $3,057,812 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $1,431,849 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTexas Health Physicians Group: $990,061 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULOSKELETAL TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION INC: $393,045 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Texas Healthy Communities: $343,164 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $85,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIrving Symphony Orchestra Association Inc: $47,300 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetTexas EMS Trauma and Acute Care Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVIOLAS HOUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUB Foundation Activities Inc: $15,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $14,404 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUROLOGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $6,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Texas Diversity Council: $5,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Texas Health Presbyte…United Way of Metropo…The Dallas FoundationNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX19.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Plano · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas?

    Find your warmest path to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home