· Public charity
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $873,010 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $899,070 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,060 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
- $250k+1 grant · $814k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Texas Health Resources Foundation | $813,585 |
| Irving Symphony Orchestra | $16,350 |
| Crystal Charity Ball | $12,500 |
| March of Dimes | $10,000 |
| Healing Hands Ministries | $7,500 |
| Vickery Meadow Youth Devlp Foundation | $6,700 |
| Dallas Arboretum & Botanical Society | $6,375 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $18M · revenue +313% · 59% of their budget
- DSDALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION7× · 2017–2023 · $3.1M · revenue +207%
- THTexas Health Resources Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +66%
Funded once
- DCDallas County Indigent Careone grant, 2017 · $8.1M · revenue -100%
- DCDALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTone grant, 2017 · $2.1M
- MTMUSCULOSKELETAL TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $393k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
Conduct medical research, offer educational programs and undertake development projects that contribute to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Healthy Communities and the most unlike its peers is Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Dallas County Indigent Care ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
- Who funds Texas Health Physicians Group ↗
- Who funds MUSCULOSKELETAL TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds North Texas Healthy Communities ↗
- Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
- Who funds Texas Women's Foundation ↗
- Who funds Irving Symphony Orchestra Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Texas EMS Trauma and Acute Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds BROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND ↗
- Who funds VIOLAS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds UB Foundation Activities Inc ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds UROLOGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds The Texas Diversity Council ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Plano · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas?
Find your warmest path to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.