Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas Association Against Sexual Assault Inc

Provide state-wide conference including workshops; provided staff training; developed international brochures on a variety of sexual assault issues.

$4.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$351k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$6.4MHealth$2.0MCivil Rights$874kHousing & Shelter$518kRecreation & Sports$321kCommunity Improvement$230kPublic Safety & Disaster$210kPhilanthropy$201kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+6 grants · $1.9M
$152,607
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dallas Area Rape Crisis$350,810
The Turning Point-RCC Collin$338,853
Saheli Asian Family Support$335,125
Women's Ctr Tarrant County$326,951
Denton County Friends$255,676
Safer Path Family Violence Shelter$253,647
Brazos Cty RC SARC (Sexual Assault Resource Cntr)$239,171
Alamo Area RCC$217,992
Mama Sana Vibrant Women$174,382
Deaf Smith County Crisis Ctr$173,467
Latina Trans in Texas$168,306
Open Arms$165,332
Family Services of SE Texas$157,970
Rape & Suicide Crisis SETX Bmt$157,909
Borderland Rainbow Ctr$152,607
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Womens Ctr East TX: $35k → 8%Family Support Services Amarillo: $35k → 9%Hays County Womens Ctr: $123k → 10%Abigail's Arms Cooke County: $127k → 13%Resource Crisis Center of Galveston Cnty: $133k → 14%Houston Area Womens Center: $59k → 16%Family Services of SE Texas: $158k → 19%Women TogetherMujeres Unidas: $125k → 27%Family Support Services of Amarillo: $23k → 9%Hays county womens ctr: $22k → 10%Abigail's Arms Cooke county: $76k → 13%Resource Crisis Center of Galveston Cnty: $77k → 14%Dallas Area Rape Crisis: $351k → 14%Houston Area Womens Ctr: $58k → 16%Women TogetherMujeres Unidas: $52k → 27%Dallas Area Rape Crisis: $184k → 14%Dallas Area Rape Crisis: $72k → 14%Houston Area Center: $27k → 16%Family services of SE Texas: $82k → 19%Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center: $55k → 14%Family Time Crisis and Counseling: $13k → 16%Family Services of SE Texas: $76k → 19%Dallas Area Rape Crisis: $34k → 14%Family Services of Southeast Texas: $17k → 19%Latina Trans in Texas: $168k → 16%Latina Trans in Texas: $145k → 16%Organisacion Latina Trans: $56k → 16%Organizacion Latina Trans in Texas: $29k → 16%Latina Trans in Texas: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 33 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
4

Total granted

$11M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+46%

Still filing today

94%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SAHELI
    5× · 2020–2024 · $786k · revenue +131%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $770k · revenue +11%
  • DA
    Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center
    5× · 2020–2024 · $695k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTERgraduated
    2× · 2020–2021 · $39k · revenue +70%
  • MR
    Midland Rape Crisis Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $32k · revenue +34%
  • LR
    LUBBOCK RAPE CRISIS CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
2
Saafe House

Saafe house is committed to empowering victims of family violence and sexual assault by providing individualized, immediate, free, and confidential services. our goal is to prevent family violence.

Health
3
Family Abuse Center Inc

The family abuse center exists to eliminate domestic violence in central texas by sheltering victims of domestic violence and by preventing abuse from occurring through intervention and education.

Human Services
4
Crisis Center for Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault

The crisis center is committed to the prevention and elimination of domestic violence and sexual assault. we work to enhance safety and to promote equality in relationships.

—
5
Crisis Control Center

Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.

Human Services
6
Womens Center of Brazoria County Inc

Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Human Services
7
Crisis Center of the Plains

To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.

Human Services
8
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
9
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
10
Crisis Center of West Texas

Crisis center of west texas' mission is to respond, shelter, and educate to end domestic and sexual violence in west texas.

—
11
Family Crisis Center

Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.

Health
12
Family Crisis Center

Assist individuals and families in crisis from domestic violence, sexual assault, crime and economic emergencies. Services are also available to friends and family members of those involved.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom House and the most unlike its peers is Fuerza Unida. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%4%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr10%50%35–55yr12%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%5%<5yr16%14%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr10%41%35–55yr12%7%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/65
the rest of the field
16%
12,736/79,561

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/64
Grantees still filing
50/64
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center — $695,230 · Human ServicesDallas Area Rape Crisis CenterDENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC — $481,713 · Human ServicesDENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY IN…Organizacion Latina Trans in Texas — $410,222 · Human ServicesOrganizacion Latina Trans in TexasFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC — $331,599 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INCFAMILIES IN CRISIS — $298,310 · Human ServicesFAMILIES IN CRISISHAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER — $233,430 · Human ServicesHAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTERRESOURCE & CRISIS CENTER OF GALVESTON COUNTY TEXAS — $209,839 · Human ServicesRESOURCE & CRISIS CENTER OF GALVESTON …ABIGAILS ARMS COOKE COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $202,650 · Human ServicesABIGAILS ARMS COOKE COUNTY FAMILY CRIS…FAMILY CRISIS CENTER OF THE BIG BEND INC — $182,711 · Human ServicesWOMEN TOGETHER FOUNDATION INC — $177,776 · Human ServicesHouston Area Women's Center — $143,893 · Human ServicesWOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC — $135,755 · Human Services+2 more — $126,172 · Human ServicesRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY — $680,582 · OtherRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF COL…RAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC — $321,284 · OtherRAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF …Friendship of Women Inc — $321,247 · OtherFriendship of Women IncLUBBOCK ADDICTION AND RECOVERY CENTER — $320,838 · OtherLUBBOCK ADDICTION AND REC…HILL COUNTRY CRISIS COUNCIL INC — $225,226 · OtherHILL COUNTRY CRISIS COUNC…MONTGOMERY COUNTY WOMENS CENTER — $206,890 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY WOMENS …WOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS — $188,043 · OtherWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH …PANHANDLE CRISIS CENTER INC — $124,840 · Other+4 more — $86,997 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $770,459 · HealthTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TAR…Brazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc — $519,772 · HealthBrazos County Rape Crisis…Vibrant Woman Mama Sana — $515,530 · HealthVibrant Woman Mama SanaALAMO AREA RESOURCE CENTER INC — $422,955 · HealthALAMO AREA RESOURCE CENTE…HUNT COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC Crisis Center of Northeast Texas — $172,847 · HealthHUNT COUNTY RAPE CRISIS C…+3 more — $37,951 · HealthSAHELI — $786,072 · Community ImprovementSAHELIOPEN ARMS RAPE CRISIS CENTER & LGBT SERVICES — $229,906 · Community ImprovementOPEN ARMS …BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER — $519,646 · Civil RightsSAFER PATH FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER — $330,152 · Housing & ShelterWINTERGARDEN WOMEN'S SHELTER — $210,462 · Public Safety & DisasterDEAF SMITH COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC — $201,310 · Philanthropy
Human Services$3,629,300Other$2,475,947Health$2,439,514Community Improvement$1,015,978Civil Rights$519,646Housing & Shelter$330,152Public Safety & Disaster$210,462Philanthropy$201,310

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAHELI — $786,072 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $770,459 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetDallas Area Rape Crisis Center — $695,230 over 5y, 17% of budgetRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY — $680,582 over 5y, 14% of budgetBrazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc — $519,772 over 4y, 20% of budgetBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER — $519,646 over 5y, 38% of budgetVibrant Woman Mama Sana — $515,530 over 5y, 15% of budgetDENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC — $481,713 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetALAMO AREA RESOURCE CENTER INC — $422,955 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetOrganizacion Latina Trans in Texas — $410,222 over 5y, 54% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC — $331,599 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetSAFER PATH FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER — $330,152 over 3y, 14% of budgetRAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC — $321,284 over 4y, 28% of budgetFriendship of Women Inc — $321,247 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetFAMILIES IN CRISIS — $298,310 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER — $233,430 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetOPEN ARMS RAPE CRISIS CENTER & LGBT SERVICES — $229,906 over 4y, 38% of budgetHILL COUNTRY CRISIS COUNCIL INC — $225,226 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetWINTERGARDEN WOMEN'S SHELTER — $210,462 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetRESOURCE & CRISIS CENTER OF GALVESTON COUNTY TEXAS — $209,839 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY WOMENS CENTER — $206,890 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetABIGAILS ARMS COOKE COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $202,650 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetDEAF SMITH COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC — $201,310 over 2y, 39% of budgetWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS — $188,043 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER OF THE BIG BEND INC — $182,711 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetHUNT COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC Crisis Center of Northeast Texas — $172,847 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetHouston Area Women's Center — $143,893 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC — $135,755 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPANHANDLE CRISIS CENTER INC — $124,840 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO — $113,025 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER — $39,441 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc — $31,956 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLUBBOCK RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $18,047 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $14,832 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY TIME CRISIS AND COUNSELING CENTER — $13,147 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAWARE CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $8,993 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHIGHLAND LAKES FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $6,607 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Montrose Center — $5,072 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Council on Fami…Astros FoundationMary Kay Ash Foundati…Texas Bar FoundationChildren's Advocacy C…United Way of Greater…Alice Kleberg Reynold…Greater Houston Commu…Texas Mutual Insuranc…Texas Instruments Fou…Christus HealthSan Antonio Food Bank
Texas Council on Family Violence IncTX72.2× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Council on Family Violence Inc · Astros Foundation · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Texas Bar Foundation · Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Inc · United Way of Greater Houston · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Texas Instruments Foundation · Christus Health · San Antonio Food Bank

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Association Against Sexual Assault Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home