Skip to content

· Public charity

Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc

Raise funds to benefit worthy local charitable and educational organizations.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$90kHuman Services$90kHealth$75kArts & Culture$40kAnimals$30kCrime & Legal$20kEnvironment$10kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $80,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $90,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITIZENS FOSTER CARE REVIEW$40,000
THE NAPLES ZOO EDUCATION FUND$10,000
NAPLES PLAYERS ACADEMY OF DRA$10,000
FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACAD$10,000
CHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CITIZENS FOSTER CARE REVIEW: $40k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $50k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $50k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACAD: $10k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACAD: $10k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 4 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$205k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $80k · revenue +210%
  • RK
    RICKY KING FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue -57% · 32% of their budget
  • TN
    THE NAPLES PLAYERS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue -56%

Funded once

  • YH
    YOUTH HAVEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +149%
  • TF
    THE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +285%
  • CC
    COLLIER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nami Palm Beach County Inc

Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
2
Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—
3
Florida Alliance of Children's Councils & Trusts Inc

To promote policies that build effective primary prevention and early intervention systems of support for florida's children and families by engaging and enhancing the collective strengths of the individual children's services councils of…

—
4
Royal Palm Academy Inc

The mission of royal palm academy is to partner with families to provide an education of rich academics with catholic formation. we teach the mind, educate the heart, and form the character of tomorrow's leaders.

Human Services
5
Equality Florida Institute Inc

Equality florida institute is the educational arm of the largest civil rights organization in florida dedicated to ending discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Civil Rights
6
Florida Keys Educational Foundation Inc

To provide financial and other essential support to further the mission and goals of the college of the florida keys (cfk).

—
7
Naples Children Foundation Inc

To create lasting change by investing in proven programs that transform the lives of vulnerable children in collier county. through strong partnerships, we bridge gaps in education and healthcare delivering measurable results that empower…

Philanthropy
8
Early Learning Coalition of Palm Beach County Inc

To manage, improve and evaluate an integrated and quality seamless service delivery system for all publicly-funded early care and education programs serving children from birth to five years of age and school-age siblings to serve families…

Education
9
Polk County School Readiness Coalition Inc

We will lead community efforts in supporting the success of children.

Education
10
Foster Care Review Inc

See schedule o.foster care review, inc., d/b/a florida foster care review (ffcr) promotes the safety, well-being and long-term success of abused and neglected children and youth.

—
11
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
12
Florida Children's Museum Inc

Curating the world for all children to explore

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Collier County Child Advocacy Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Citizens Foster Care Review Board. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $80,000 · Human ServicesFun Time Early Childhood Academy IncYOUTH HAVEN INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INCCITIZENS FOSTER CARE REVIEW BOARD: $40,000 · Human ServicesCITIZENS FOSTER CARE REVIEW BOARDRICKY KING FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyRICKY KING FOUNDATION INCEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF CO…STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropySTARABILITY FOUNDATION INCLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM…THE NAPLES PLAYERS INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NAPLES P…NAPLES ZOO INC: $30,000 · AnimalsNAPLES ZO…THE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalCOLLIER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $10,000 · Environment
Human Services$170,000Philanthropy$85,000Arts & Culture$40,000Animals$30,000Crime & Legal$10,000Civil Rights$10,000Youth Development$10,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $80,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetRICKY KING FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NAPLES PLAYERS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Naples Children Foundation IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Naples Children Foundation Inc · The League Club Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Florida Bar Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Terra Cotta Golf Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph