· Public charity
Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc
Raise funds to benefit worthy local charitable and educational organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $80,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $90,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITIZENS FOSTER CARE REVIEW | $40,000 |
| THE NAPLES ZOO EDUCATION FUND | $10,000 |
| NAPLES PLAYERS ACADEMY OF DRA | $10,000 |
| FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACAD | $10,000 |
| CHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FTFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $80k · revenue +210%
- RKRICKY KING FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue -57% · 32% of their budget
- TNTHE NAPLES PLAYERS INC4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue -56%
Funded once
- YHYOUTH HAVEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +149%
- TFTHE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +285%
- CCCOLLIER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
To promote policies that build effective primary prevention and early intervention systems of support for florida's children and families by engaging and enhancing the collective strengths of the individual children's services councils of…
The mission of royal palm academy is to partner with families to provide an education of rich academics with catholic formation. we teach the mind, educate the heart, and form the character of tomorrow's leaders.
Equality florida institute is the educational arm of the largest civil rights organization in florida dedicated to ending discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
To provide financial and other essential support to further the mission and goals of the college of the florida keys (cfk).
To create lasting change by investing in proven programs that transform the lives of vulnerable children in collier county. through strong partnerships, we bridge gaps in education and healthcare delivering measurable results that empower…
To manage, improve and evaluate an integrated and quality seamless service delivery system for all publicly-funded early care and education programs serving children from birth to five years of age and school-age siblings to serve families…
We will lead community efforts in supporting the success of children.
See schedule o.foster care review, inc., d/b/a florida foster care review (ffcr) promotes the safety, well-being and long-term success of abused and neglected children and youth.
We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.
Curating the world for all children to explore
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Collier County Child Advocacy Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Citizens Foster Care Review Board. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds RICKY KING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE NAPLES PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS FOSTER CARE REVIEW BOARD ↗
- Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds THE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLLIER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Naples Children Foundation Inc · The League Club Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- Youth Haven Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Florida Bar Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Terra Cotta Golf Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.