Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc.

$60M
Granted FY2025still arriving
100
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Employment$408MHealth$819kEducation$170k
02FY2025 · 100 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $416k
  • $50k–250k42 grants · $5.7M
  • $250k+29 grants · $55M
$143,832
Median grant
10
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEVS HUMAN SERVICES$12,699,628
EDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC$8,435,222
IMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION$6,396,132
ECKERD CONNECTS$5,856,499
EASTERN NORTH PWDC$5,487,041
CONGRESO DE LATINOS$2,973,756
UNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT$1,565,432
PHILADELPHIA ENERGY AUTHORITY$1,277,463
YOUTHBUILD PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL$1,200,000
PHILADELPHIA AREA LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE$900,471
POWERCORPSPHL$853,249
FOUNDATIONS INC$726,484
PHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES$551,038
COMMUNITY INTEGRATED SERVICES$515,503
FULL CIRCLE COMPUTING$476,405
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $71.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $246k → 11%ECKERD CONNECTS: $5.9M → 12%ECKERD CONNECTS: $4.5M → 13%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $213k → 11%ECKERD CONNECTS: $5.4M → 12%ECKERD CONNECTS: $4.7M → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES: $4.1M → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES: $373k → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES: $129k → 12%EASTERN NORTH PWDC: $5.5M → 22%EASTERN NORTH PWDC: $5.5M → 22%EASTERN NORTH PWDC: $4.7M → 22%EASTERN NORTH: $4.4M → 22%EASTERN NORTH: $4.1M → 22%EASTERN NORTH: $3.7M → 22%EASTERN NORTH: $3.7M → 22%RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $175k → 22%RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $158k → 22%RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $132k → 22%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $480k → 22%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $472k → 22%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $468k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $273k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $249k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $211k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $145k → 22%HIAS PENNSYLVANIA: $407k → 22%HIAS PENNSYLVANIA: $366k → 22%EASTERN NORTH PWDC: $4.4M → 22%WELCOMING CENTER: $451k → 22%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $215k → 22%CLARIFI: $214k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $184k → 22%WELCOMING CENTER: $1.1M → 22%WELCOMING CENTER: $809k → 22%WELCOMING CENTER: $669k → 22%WELCOMING CENTER: $589k → 22%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $321k → 22%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $308k → 22%CLARIFI: $251k → 22%CLARIFI: $249k → 22%CLARIFI: $229k → 22%CLARIFI: $221k → 22%CLARIFI: $218k → 22%CLARIFI: $91k → 22%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $77k → 22%MAGNOLIA IMPACT SOLUTIONS: $195k → 22%MAGNOLIA IMPACT SOLUTIONS: $49k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$403M · 113 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

113 repeat relationships — 75 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

113
53

Total granted

$403M
$4.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+0%

Still filing today

58%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEVS HUMAN SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60M · revenue +68%
  • IS
    IMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39M · revenue +128% · 44% of their budget
  • EN
    Eastern North Philadelphia Workforce Development Corp
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36M · revenue +49% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.0M
  • EP
    EQUITY PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $801k · 84% of their budget
  • FB
    FRONTIDA BIOPHARM
    2× · 2017–2018 · $226k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
2
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
3
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
4
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
5
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
6
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
7
Youth Empowerment Services

To re-engage out-of-school youth with alternative educational programs and job connections, life skills training,counseling, media and technology skills

Education
8
Programs Employing People

Our mission is to develop, coordinate and improve the services and supports that are offered in the disability system and to ensure that each person has access to the care they need to live a productive and meaningful life.

Employment
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Philadelphia Electrical & Technology Cha

The mission of the philadelphia electrical and technology charter high school is to develop students who will be employable in the emeraging high-tech industries; while giving students a strong foundation in the core academic…

Education
11
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
12
Graduate Philadelphia

Graduate philadelphia is a nonprofit organization with a mission to increase the number of low-to-moderate income adults completing a postsecondary credential in the greater philadelphia region, by engaging business, higher education,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban League of Greater Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is Love Pray Peace Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyNeighborhood Economic Devel…Senior Residential HousingFood & Homelessness ReliefHealthcare Support Organiza…Regional Economic Developme…Disability Support ServicesCharter and Independent Sch…Youth Development ProgramsArts & Cultural Infrastruct…Civil Legal Aid ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Youth and Crime Victim Serv…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%2%<5yr15%11%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr14%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr17%38%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr14%25%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%2/213
the rest of the field
13%
3,838/28,783

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 189 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/99
Grantees still filing
67/99
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEVS HUMAN SERVICES — $60,365,826 · OtherJEVS HUMAN SERVICESEDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC — $54,368,915 · OtherEDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INCPHILA HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE DISTRICT 1199C TRAINING AND UPGRADING FUND — $7,516,892 · Other+123 more — $43,270,120 · Other+123 moreEastern North Philadelphia Workforce Development Corp — $36,046,617 · Human ServicesEastern North Phila…ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC — $25,059,314 · Human ServicesECKERD YOUTH ALTERN…WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS — $5,059,042 · Human ServicesWELCOMING CENTER FO…+7 more — $5,626,197 · Human Services+7 morePHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC — $62,444,493 · Youth DevelopmentPHILADELPHIA YOUTH…+2 more — $3,367,524 · Youth DevelopmentIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION — $39,273,349 · EmploymentIMPACT SERVICES …SER METRO DETROIT JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC — $12,353,567 · EmploymentSER METRO DETROI…COMMUNITY INTEGRATED SERVICES — $2,431,025 · Employment+7 more — $5,077,706 · Employment+7 morePHILADELPHIA YOUTH FOR CHANGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $4,813,776 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $4,076,193 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $2,746,469 · EducationCommunities in Schools of Philadelphia Inc — $2,559,952 · EducationLIGUORI INC — $1,702,358 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $1,314,569 · EducationBIG PICTURE PHILADELPHIA — $1,068,022 · EducationPHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES INC — $829,506 · Education+17 more — $2,105,615 · EducationCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $14,670,473 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,278,144 · HealthTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $819,040 · Health+7 more — $874,878 · HealthUNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT — $3,568,431 · Community ImprovementNO-MO — $2,974,724 · Community ImprovementDIMPLEZ 4 DAYZ INCORPORATED — $942,059 · Community ImprovementFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $330,745 · Community ImprovementCHESTER COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $285,788 · Community Improvement
Other$165,521,753Human Services$71,791,170Youth Development$65,812,017Employment$59,135,647Education$21,216,460Health$17,642,535Community Improvement$8,101,747

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC — $62,444,493 over 8y, 53% of budgetJEVS HUMAN SERVICES — $60,365,826 over 9y, 13% of budgetIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION — $39,273,349 over 9y, 44% of budgetEastern North Philadelphia Workforce Development Corp — $36,046,617 over 9y, 100% of budgetECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC — $25,059,314 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $14,670,473 over 9y, 15% of budgetSER METRO DETROIT JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC — $12,353,567 over 4y, 52% of budgetPHILA HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE DISTRICT 1199C TRAINING AND UPGRADING FUND — $7,516,892 over 9y, 19% of budgetWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS — $5,059,042 over 9y, 46% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH FOR CHANGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $4,813,776 over 5y, 15% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $4,076,193 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT — $3,568,431 over 5y, 13% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $3,263,247 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetNO-MO — $2,974,724 over 7y, 45% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $2,746,469 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCommunities in Schools of Philadelphia Inc — $2,559,952 over 8y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY INTEGRATED SERVICES — $2,431,025 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA AREA LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE INC — $2,321,196 over 3y, 91% of budgetFEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS — $2,123,236 over 7y, 34% of budgetLIGUORI INC — $1,702,358 over 7y, 17% of budgetJOBWORKS INC — $1,698,267 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $1,609,511 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF DELAWARE VALLEY — $1,471,490 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetCONNECTION TRAINING SERVICES — $1,394,974 over 6y, 35% of budgetPowerCorpsPHL — $1,353,249 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $1,314,569 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC — $1,303,398 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,278,144 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAFL-CIO PHILADELPHIA COUNCIL — $1,250,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetYOUTH EMPOWERMENT FOR ADVANCEMENT HANGOUT — $1,244,288 over 5y, 17% of budgetFOUNDATIONS INC — $1,196,407 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetSTRADA COLLABORATIVE INC — $1,094,623 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBIG PICTURE PHILADELPHIA — $1,068,022 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetENERGY COORDINATING AGENCY OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $1,057,976 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetDIMPLEZ 4 DAYZ INCORPORATED — $942,059 over 5y, 80% of budgetUTILITY EMERGENCY SERVICES FUND — $939,997 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR GREATER PHILADEPHIA — $934,997 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA — $916,901 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $914,537 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY & PHILADELPHIA — $849,581 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES INC — $829,506 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $819,040 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEQUITY PROJECT — $800,861 over 1y, 84% of budgetHIAS and Council Migration Service of Philadelphia Inc — $773,468 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCOLLEGIATE CONSORTIUM FOR WORKFORCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $569,905 over 7y, 20% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER INC — $495,411 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetResources for Human Development Inc — $465,362 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION — $448,934 over 6y, 3.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JEVS HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Eastern North Philadelphia Workforce Development Corp ↗
  • Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC ↗
  • Who funds SER METRO DETROIT JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILA HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE DISTRICT 1199C TRAINING AND UPGRADING FUND ↗
  • Who funds WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH FOR CHANGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds NO-MO ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Communities in Schools of Philadelphia Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INTEGRATED SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA AREA LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds LIGUORI INC ↗
  • Who funds JOBWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF DELAWARE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTION TRAINING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PowerCorpsPHL ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds AFL-CIO PHILADELPHIA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMPOWERMENT FOR ADVANCEMENT HANGOUT ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds STRADA COLLABORATIVE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…The William Penn Foun…United Way of Greater…Drexel UniversityThe Barra Foundation …Philadelphia City Fun…Independence Foundati…The Patricia Kind Fam…Temple University - O…The Neubauer Family F…Lindback Cr & Mf Foun…W W Smith Charitable …
The Philadelphia FoundationPA56× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Drexel University · The Barra Foundation Inc · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · Independence Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education · The Neubauer Family Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · W W Smith Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Philadelphia Works Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • The Workplace Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Bayada Home Health Care Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 189 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines