Skip to content
Teammates for Kids Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Teammates for Kids Foundation

In partnership with professional athletes, corporations, foundations, celebrities and individual teammates, we help children in the areas of health, education and inner city.

$1.8M
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
10
States reached
$662k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$4.9MHuman Services$2.5MYouth Development$2.0MRecreation & Sports$1.8MEducation$1.3MPhilanthropy$573kInternational$519kReligion$164kOther$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $363k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$30,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$93M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$661,506
Individual grant recipient$384,407
PASTIME YOUTH ACADEMIES$251,000
VERTICAL LLC$104,223
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION$80,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$73,845
JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$55,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$50,000
COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION -CHILD LIFE DEPT$30,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND$25,000
OKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$22,154
A ONE STOP PRINT SHOP$13,187
PROHOLDINGS$11,509
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - CHILD LIFE DEPT$8,629
SANTA ROSA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$7,980
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOE'S PLACE CORPORATION: $30k → 11%CARE TO LEARN: $25k → 15%BLUES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $14k → 21%CHICAGO WHITE SOX CHARITIES: $15k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC: $25k → 16%BIG LEAGUE IMPACT: $25k → 12%KIDS VOICE OF INDIANA INC: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.2M · 42 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 32 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
74

Total granted

$9.2M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+52%

Still filing today

74%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $738k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +2% · 98% of their budget
  • CC
    Cook Children's Medical Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $469k · revenue +123%
  • CC
    CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $409k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • ML
    Major League Baseball Charities Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $890k · revenue -10%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY URBAN YOUTH ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $123k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Giants Community Fund

The giants community fund (the "fund") uses baseball and softball to promote health, education, and character development to propel youth in underserved regions to be positive forces in their communities. the fund, a 501(c)(3) public…

Philanthropy
2
Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation
Recreation & Sports
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
5
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
6
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
7
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Major League Baseball Players Trust

The major league baseball players trust harnesses the expertise, influence, and energy of players to create meaningful and sustainable change in the lifelong well-being of others. this is achieved through a series of programs that are run…

Recreation & Sports
9
Arkansas Children's Foundation

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
10
Children's Hospital Foundation

See schedule ochildren's hospital foundation dba children's national hospital foundation supports world class care and research for the nation's children. children's national hospital foundation serves as the fundraising arm for children's…

Health
11
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
12
Charlotte Hornets Foundation Inc

Through the investment of time, talents, and treasure, the charlotte hornets foundation will support, promote, and enhance important community efforts that enrich the quality of life for those in need, especially children and youth…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Astros Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/102
Grantees still filing
79/102
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,880,195 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAGLE ALLIANCE CHURCH OF THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE: $534,333 · OtherEAGLE ALLIANCE CHURCH OF THE CHRISTIAN AND M…PROCAMPS INC: $459,899 · OtherPROCAMPS INCMICROSOFT: $422,913 · OtherMICROSOFTKANSAS CITY URBAN YOUTH ACADEMY INC: $300,000 · OtherKANSAS CITY URBAN YOUTH ACADEMY INCVERTICAL LLC: $279,463 · Other+56 more: $1,667,358 · Other+56 moreCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA GROUP RETURN: $661,506 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF …Cook Children's Medical Center: $469,179 · HealthCook Children's Medical C…CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $408,936 · HealthCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUND…Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $364,173 · HealthChildren's Hospital Color…Texas Children's Hospital: $258,336 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $250,551 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER…JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $129,863 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $118,681 · Health+11 more: $481,710 · Health+11 moreMajor League Baseball Charities Inc: $890,000 · PhilanthropyMajor League Ba…James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $267,989 · PhilanthropyJames Whitcomb …THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $216,250 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CIN…ST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND: $122,750 · PhilanthropyST LOUIS CARDIN…NASHVILLE PREDATORS FOUNDATION: $94,000 · PhilanthropyColorado Rockies Baseball Club Foundation: $90,000 · Philanthropy+12 more: $297,217 · Philanthropy+12 morePASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC: $1,427,546 · Recreation & SportsPASTIME WITH…+8 more: $135,000 · Recreation & Sports+8 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $966,176 · EducationUCLA FOUN…TEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $85,250 · EducationTEXAS RAN…+6 more: $82,068 · Education+6 moreHope for Haiti Childrens Center Inc: $274,401 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $244,333 · InternationalFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentILITCH CHARITIES INC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentEAGLE U INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentWASHINGTON NATIONALS PHILANTHROPIES: $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentAnthony Munoz Foundation: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentMARINERS CARE: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,544,161Health$3,142,935Philanthropy$1,978,206Recreation & Sports$1,562,546Education$1,133,494International$518,734Youth Development$188,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC: $1,427,546 over 7y, 98% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $966,176 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMajor League Baseball Charities Inc: $890,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA GROUP RETURN: $661,506 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center: $469,179 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $408,936 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $364,173 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHope for Haiti Childrens Center Inc: $274,401 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $267,989 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $258,336 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $250,551 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $244,333 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $216,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $129,863 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND: $122,750 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $118,681 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetArizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $95,924 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE PREDATORS FOUNDATION: $94,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $91,174 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL VOLUNTEERS: $90,847 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetColorado Rockies Baseball Club Foundation: $90,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $86,174 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $85,250 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetIndiana University Health Inc: $69,186 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRadical Inc: $67,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE KANSAS CITY ROYALS FOUNDATION: $54,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMONUMENTAL SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION: $52,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIFE IS GOOD PLAYMAKER PROJECT INC: $46,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE: $40,426 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIRATES CHARITIES: $30,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSHARE FOOD PROGRAM: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI MARLINS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Cubs Charities: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetILITCH CHARITIES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC: $29,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BALTIMORE ORIOLES FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTHE CINCINNATI REDS COMMUNITY FUND: $26,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCare to Learn: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAVE OUR YOUTH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Major League Baseball…Fantasy Camps for KidsMajor League Baseball…Jackson Yelle Family …Pitch in for Baseball…Big League Impact IncEnterprise Holdings F…Dick's Sporting Goods…Texas Rangers Basebal…Nfl Foundation IncWorld Wide Technology…The Arthur M Blank Fa…
Major League Baseball Charities IncNY49.5× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Major League Baseball Charities Inc · Fantasy Camps for Kids · Major League Baseball Players Trust · Jackson Yelle Family Foundation · Pitch in for Baseball and Softball · Big League Impact Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Texas Rangers Baseball Foundation · Nfl Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teammates for Kids Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teammates for Kids Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc: 33% of income from government
  • The Red Sox Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Teammates for Kids Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Teammates for Kids Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $3.8M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Teammates for Kids’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home