· Private foundation
Taubert Memorial Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
- $250k+4 grants · $2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMM | $650,000 |
| OXFAM AMERICA | $600,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $600,000 |
| NATL ASSOC OF FREE CLINICS | $300,000 |
| SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND | $30,000 |
| WHITE BIRD CLINIC | $5,000 |
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY SHARING PROGRAM | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| FOOD AND WATER WATCH | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL REPROGRAMMING INC2× · 2017–2020 · $56k · revenue +25% · 47% of their budget
- CHCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE3× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue ×14
- CCCARRIZO COMECRUDO NATION OF TEXAS INC2× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +684%
Funded once
- RORURAL ORGANIZING PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $409k · revenue +74%
- PLPiikani Lodge Health Institutegraduatedone grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +198%
- OOLCERIone grant, 2021 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.
Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
The Deep Medicine Circle is a nonprofit organization dedicated to healing the wounds of colonialism through food, medicine, story and learning. Starting from a place of correcting relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people,…
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Juust Living Dba Just Living Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds RURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds PAZA - TREE OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds Piikani Lodge Health Institute ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL REPROGRAMMING INC ↗
- Who funds UNKITAWA ↗
- Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
- Who funds NATIVE HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds CARRIZO COMECRUDO NATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER ACTION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN INC ↗
- Who funds ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RED CLOUD RENEWABLE ↗
- Who funds SPONSORS INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
- Who funds SQUAREONE VILLAGES ↗
- Who funds Na'ah Illahee Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Lane County · The Oregon Community Foundation · Lane Community Health Council · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · Impactassetsinc · The Collins Foundation · The Suwinski Family Foundation Inc · Food for Lane County · The Woodard Family Foundation · Chambers Family Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Taubert Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Womenspace — 62% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- White Bird Clinic — 29% of income from government
- Beyond Toxics — 13% of income from government
- Sponsors Inc — 8% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- South Lane Mental Health Services Inc — 5% of income from government
- Squareone Villages — 2% of income from government
- Mian Yan — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.