Skip to content
Taubert Memorial Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Taubert Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$650k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.2MHealth$1.0MHuman Services$771kCivil Rights$477kEnvironment$196kReligion$173kArts & Culture$151kFood & Nutrition$132kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.1M
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMM$650,000
OXFAM AMERICA$600,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$600,000
NATL ASSOC OF FREE CLINICS$300,000
SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND$30,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$5,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$5,000
WHITE BIRD CLINIC$5,000
COMMUNITY SHARING PROGRAM$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
FOOD AND WATER WATCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LYME LIGHT FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%LYME LIGHT FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%SAFE HORIZON: $500 → 17%THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE: $6k → 17%THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE: $6k → 17%THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE: $5k → 17%THE TRAUMA HEALING PROJECT: $2k → 15%THE TRAUMA HEALING PROJECT: $1k → 15%WOMENSSPACE: $1k → 15%THE TRAUMA HEALING PROJECT: $500 → 15%COMMUNITY SHARING PROGRAM: $5k → 15%COMMUNITY SHARING PROGRAM: $2k → 15%COMMUNITY SHARING: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
NM
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 43 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
88

Total granted

$1.2M
$902k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+42%

Still filing today

47%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL REPROGRAMMING INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $56k · revenue +25% · 47% of their budget
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE
    3× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue ×14
  • CC
    CARRIZO COMECRUDO NATION OF TEXAS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +684%

Funded once

  • RO
    RURAL ORGANIZING PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $409k · revenue +74%
  • O
    OLCERI
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • PL
    Piikani Lodge Health Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +198%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
5
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
6
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
7
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
8
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
9
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
10
Deep Medicine Circle

The Deep Medicine Circle is a nonprofit organization dedicated to healing the wounds of colonialism through food, medicine, story and learning. Starting from a place of correcting relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people,…

Health
11
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
12
350PDX

Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Juust Living Dba Just Living Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/59
Grantees still filing
45/59
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $650,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEEIndividual grant recipient: $299,682 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTERTRIBAL SPIRITUAL LODGES: $171,750 · OtherINTERTRIBAL SPIRITUAL LODGESANTINANCO: $105,000 · Other+108 more: $747,587 · Other+108 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $600,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA IN…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $600,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC+3 more: $16,000 · InternationalRURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT: $409,065 · Civil RightsRURAL ORGA…+1 more: $500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $300,000 · Community ImprovementPAZA - TREE OF LIFE INC: $145,000 · Arts & CulturePiikani Lodge Health Institute: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureUNKITAWA: $55,000 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $50,000 · EnvironmentSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND: $30,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $17,000 · EnvironmentRED CLOUD RENEWABLE: $11,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $10,560 · Environment+4 more: $8,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL REPROGRAMMING INC: $56,000 · HealthWhite Bison Inc: $10,000 · HealthSouth Lane Mental Health Services Inc: $10,000 · HealthCONSUMERS FOR DENTAL CHOICE INC: $7,000 · HealthWHITE BIRD CLINIC: $6,500 · HealthMIAN YAN: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · Health
Other$1,974,019International$1,216,000Civil Rights$409,565Community Improvement$300,000Arts & Culture$207,500Environment$181,560Health$95,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $600,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPAZA - TREE OF LIFE INC: $145,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetPiikani Lodge Health Institute: $60,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL REPROGRAMMING INC: $56,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetUNKITAWA: $55,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH: $51,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNATIVE HOPE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $50,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBREAST CANCER ACTION: $14,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION: $13,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSPONSORS INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRED CLOUD RENEWABLE: $11,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $10,560 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNa'ah Illahee Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWhite Bison Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSouth Lane Mental Health Services Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSQUAREONE VILLAGES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJUUST Living DBA JUST Living Recovery: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCommunity Sharing Program: $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONSUMERS FOR DENTAL CHOICE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWHITE BIRD CLINIC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeyond Toxics: $6,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMIAN YAN: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTINANCO EARTH ARTS SCHOOL: $4,750 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRAUMA HEALING PROJECT INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA ARTS CENTER SAN DIEGO: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON COAST CHILDRENS THEATRE: $2,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLa Plata Youth Services: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLymeLight Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHeart Touch Project: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMENSPACE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEED SAVERS EXCHANGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Path Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCharity Navigator: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIC SEED ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAZA - TREE OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Piikani Lodge Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL REPROGRAMMING INC ↗
  • Who funds UNKITAWA ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds CARRIZO COMECRUDO NATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER ACTION ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SPONSORS INC ↗
  • Who funds RED CLOUD RENEWABLE ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Lane Co…The Oregon Community …Lane Community Health…Seventh Generation Fu…ImpactassetsincThe Collins FoundationThe Suwinski Family F…Food for Lane CountyThe Woodard Family Fo…Chambers Family Found…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Ford Family Found…
United Way of Lane CountyOR21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Lane County · The Oregon Community Foundation · Lane Community Health Council · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · Impactassetsinc · The Collins Foundation · The Suwinski Family Foundation Inc · Food for Lane County · The Woodard Family Foundation · Chambers Family Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Taubert Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Taubert Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Womenspace: 62% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • White Bird Clinic: 29% of income from government
  • Beyond Toxics: 13% of income from government
  • Sponsors Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • South Lane Mental Health Services Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Squareone Villages: 2% of income from government
  • Mian Yan: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Taubert Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home