Skip to content

· Private foundation

T H a T Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$26kReligion$18kFood & Nutrition$2kArts & Culture$2kHealth$2kHuman Services$1kEnvironment$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$107
Median grant
9
States reached
$223k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Outreach Uganda$6,808
Fellowship Foundation$3,210
CommunityAid$258
Arbor Day Foundation$250
AARP Foundation$250
Goodwill Industries$167
Sisters Jenny s Charity$150
NTCH$150
Lee Summit High School$107
Individual grant recipient$100
World Central Kitchen$100
Deane Center$100
Act Blue$100
Greene Free Library$100
Hamilton Gibson Theatre Group$84
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CommunityAid: $260 → 10%Simply Smiles: $25 → 9%Jason Foundation: $250 → 8%CommunityAid: $258 → 10%Woodstock Clothes Closet: $30 → 12%CommunityAid: $80 → 10%CommunityAid: $76 → 10%CommunityAid: $55 → 10%American Red Cross: $500 → 14%American Red Cross: $250 → 14%World Food Program: $125 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WI
NY
MA
OR
SD
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of T H a T Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

T H a T Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 19 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
46

Total granted

$40k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+6%

Still filing today

53%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1k · revenue ×15
  • EF
    Equipping Farmers International
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +647%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2023–2024 · $750 · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • CO
    Church of Latter Day Saings
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • MZ
    MT ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • TC
    Tiago County Partnership for Community Health
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
6
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
7
Water for People

Water for people exists to develop high quality water and sanitation, accessible to all, and sustained by strong communities, businesses, and governments, working in ten countries; guatemala, honduras, tanzania, peru, bolivia, uganda,…

International
8
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
9
Water Environment Federation

WEF's mission is inspiring the water community in pursuit of human and environmental well-being. WEF is a global environmental leader committed to water quality education and technical best practices. WEF connects water professionals;…

Environment
10
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
11
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
12
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
21/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Outreach Uganda: $22,985 · InternationalOutreach UgandaHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · InternationalEquipping Farmers International: $1,000 · International+5 more: $700 · InternationalChurch of Latter Day Saints: $6,825 · OtherChurch of Latter Day SaintsChurch of Latter Day Saings: $3,750 · OtherChurch of Latter Day SaingsFELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $3,210 · OtherFELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INCSevenoaks Retreat Center: $2,740 · OtherSevenoaks Retreat CenterMT ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1,000 · Other+45 more: $7,621 · Other+45 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $750 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AID INC: $729 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION: $250 · Human ServicesTHE JASON FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $125 · Human Services+2 more: $55 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $725 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE SHENANDOAH RIVER INC: $53 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50 · EnvironmentOUR RESCUE: $250 · Arts & CultureDEANE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $235 · Arts & CultureToo Young to Wed Inc: $140 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $40 · Arts & CultureABODE SERVICES: $450 · Housing & ShelterGREEN FREE LIBRARY: $225 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $100 · Education
International$25,685Other$25,146Human Services$2,159Environment$828Arts & Culture$665Housing & Shelter$450Education$325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOutreach Uganda: $22,985 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $3,210 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEquipping Farmers International: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY AID INC: $729 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $725 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetABODE SERVICES: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JASON FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEANE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $235 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN FREE LIBRARY: $225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDesigned For Joy: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc: $140 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $85 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SHENANDOAH RIVER INC: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPLY SMILES INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Outreach Uganda ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Equipping Farmers International ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AID INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABODE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds THE JASON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DEANE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds WELLSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
  • Who funds Designed For Joy ↗
  • Who funds Too Young to Wed Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization T H a T Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T H a T Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on T H a T’s filings →

    More from the funding graph