Skip to content
T-2961 Charitable Trust Uw T Luce Xxxxx1005 at a glance

· Private foundation

T-2961 Charitable Trust Uw T Luce Xxxxx1005

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$700k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.1MHuman Services$900kArts & Culture$580kEducation$415kPublic Benefit$385kCrime & Legal$225kPhilanthropy$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $410k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $290k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE$70,000
STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK$65,000
DREAM$55,000
ROCKING THE BOAT INC$50,000
FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES$50,000
THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP$45,000
DREAMYARD DRAMA PROJECT INC$45,000
GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER$40,000
ROW NEW YORK INC$40,000
HARLEM LACROSSE$40,000
YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK$40,000
STREETSQUASH INC$35,000
HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY FUND$35,000
SUMMER SEARCH NEW YORK CITY$35,000
RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $45k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $40k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $30k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $30k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $25k → 20%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $40k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $40k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $40k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $40k → 17%FRIENDS OF ISLAND ACADEMY INC: $30k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE: $80k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE: $80k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE: $70k → 17%Good Shepherd Services: $70k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE: $70k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE: $70k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE: $70k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE: $60k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $50k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $45k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $45k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 19 repeat orgs$330k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$4.7M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+39%

Still filing today

79%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $570k · revenue +21%
  • TD
    THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $375k · revenue +1%
  • SL
    STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $370k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • LO
    LEGAL OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue -1%
  • IC
    Ifetayo Cultural Arts Facility Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • ES
    EAST SIDE HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Futures Ignite Inc

We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.

Human Services
2
Harlem Children's Zone Inc

We enhance the life for children and families in some of nyc's most devastated neighborhoods.

Human Services
3
Leadership Education and Athletics in Partnership Inc

Leap empowers young people to be leaders who create a nurturing community for children in need. we believe that families in all neighborhoods deserve access to learning opportunities that inspire a broad world view and encourage young…

Education
4
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
5
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
6
King Hoops United

Empower the youth of new york city through basketball, providing them with academic enrichment, career development, and a strong sense of community to unlock their full potential

Youth Development
7
Reach Prep Inc

Provide transformative educational experiences that empower underserved students

Education
8
Studio in a School Association Inc

From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.

—
9
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
10
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
11
East Harlem Tutorial Program Inc

As a vital east harlem education and enrichment center, ehtp works with students from early childhood through adulthood to prepare them with the academic skills, strength of character, and social and emotional well-being to excel in high…

—
12
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Row New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Harlem Lacrosse and Leadership Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC: $350,000 · OtherHARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND I…FUND FOR THE CITY OF NY: $325,000 · OtherFUND FOR THE CITY OF NYGODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $300,000 · OtherGODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTERHARLEM REVIVING BASEBALL INNER CITY: $165,000 · OtherHARLEM REVIVING BASEBALL INNER CITYSUMMER SEARCH NEW YORK CITY: $145,000 · OtherSUMMER SEARCH NEW YORK CITYHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR: $60,000 · OtherDREAM: $55,000 · Other+8 more: $215,000 · Other+8 moreGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $570,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICESYouth Justice Network Inc: $190,000 · Human ServicesYouth Justice Network In…RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $170,000 · Human ServicesRED HOOK INITIATIVETHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INCROW NEW YORK INC: $320,000 · Recreation & SportsROW NEW YORK INCSTREETSQUASH INC: $310,000 · Recreation & SportsSTREETSQUASH INCSouth Bronx United Inc: $160,000 · Recreation & SportsSouth Bronx United In…HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION: $155,000 · Recreation & SportsHARLEM LACROSSE AND L…+1 more: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $370,000 · PhilanthropySTUDENT LEAD…HARLEM RBI INC: $190,000 · PhilanthropyHARLEM RBI I…THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC: $375,000 · Arts & CultureROCKING THE BOAT INC: $245,000 · EducationTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $160,000 · Youth DevelopmentHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,615,000Human Services$1,070,000Recreation & Sports$975,000Philanthropy$560,000Arts & Culture$375,000Education$245,000Youth Development$190,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $570,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC: $375,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $370,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC: $350,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetROW NEW YORK INC: $320,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC: $310,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetGODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $300,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetROCKING THE BOAT INC: $245,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetYouth Justice Network Inc: $190,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHARLEM RBI INC: $190,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE: $170,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $160,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSouth Bronx United Inc: $160,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION: $155,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $140,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL OUTREACH INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEAST SIDE HOUSE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROCKING THE BOAT INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Justice Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM RBI INC ↗
  • Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC ↗
  • Who funds South Bronx United Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST SIDE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds HUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL VIDEO CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinkerton FoundationThe Hyde and Watson F…The New York Communit…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Lily Auchincloss Foun…Morgan Stanley Founda…Jewish Communal FundThe Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Pinkerton FoundationNY19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinkerton Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization T-2961 Charitable Trust Uw T Luce Xxxxx1005 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T-2961 Charitable Trust Uw T Luce Xxxxx1005. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on T-2961 Charitable Trust Uw T Luce Xxxxx1005’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home