· Private foundation
T-2961 Charitable Trust Uw T Luce Xxxxx1005
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k11 grants · $410k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $290k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICE | $70,000 |
| STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK | $65,000 |
| DREAM | $55,000 |
| ROCKING THE BOAT INC | $50,000 |
| FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES | $50,000 |
| THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP | $45,000 |
| DREAMYARD DRAMA PROJECT INC | $45,000 |
| GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER | $40,000 |
| ROW NEW YORK INC | $40,000 |
| HARLEM LACROSSE | $40,000 |
| YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK | $40,000 |
| STREETSQUASH INC | $35,000 |
| SUMMER SEARCH NEW YORK CITY | $35,000 |
| HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY FUND | $35,000 |
| RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES8× · 2018–2025 · $570k · revenue +21%- TDTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC8× · 2018–2025 · $375k · revenue +1%
- SLSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC7× · 2018–2025 · $370k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- LOLEGAL OUTREACH INCone grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue -1%
- ICIfetayo Cultural Arts Facility Incone grant, 2018 · $30k
- ESEAST SIDE HOUSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.
We enhance the life for children and families in some of nyc's most devastated neighborhoods.
Leap empowers young people to be leaders who create a nurturing community for children in need. we believe that families in all neighborhoods deserve access to learning opportunities that inspire a broad world view and encourage young…
Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.
Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…
Empower the youth of new york city through basketball, providing them with academic enrichment, career development, and a strong sense of community to unlock their full potential
Provide transformative educational experiences that empower underserved students
From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.
Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.
Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…
As a vital east harlem education and enrichment center, ehtp works with students from early childhood through adulthood to prepare them with the academic skills, strength of character, and social and emotional well-being to excel in high…
The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Row New York Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harlem Lacrosse and Leadership Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
- Who funds GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROCKING THE BOAT INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Justice Network Inc ↗
- Who funds HARLEM RBI INC ↗
- Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC ↗
- Who funds South Bronx United Inc ↗
- Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds HUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL VIDEO CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pinkerton Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization T-2961 Charitable Trust Uw T Luce Xxxxx1005 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.