Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Sutter Health

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$4.2MFood & Nutrition$3.3MRecreation & Sports$1.5MHuman Services$1.4MInternational$1.4MEducation$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.0MCivil Rights$190kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $2,760,875 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,816,373 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $55,498 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $737k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.9M
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESIDIO TRUST$1,433,333
CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE$450,000
SUTTER VALLEY HOSPITALS$187,123
AMBULATORY SURGERY ACCESS COALITION$100,000
SAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY FREEDOM DAY PARADE$100,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$75,000
SACRAMENTO RUNNING ASSOCIATION$75,000
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOC$50,000
COALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE$50,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$50,000
CITY OF DAVIS$50,000
VALLEY CONSORTIUM FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION$46,243
GALLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS$25,000
PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY CALIFORNIA$20,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION INC$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $596k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAVIS STREET COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 10%INTERFAITH COUNCIL OF AMADOR: $7k → 10%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $8k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $179k → 14%FOOD PANTRY OF DAVIS STREET: $13k → 10%INTERFAITH COUNCIL OF AMADOR: $7k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $150k → 14%DAVIS STREET COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%INTERFAITH COUNCIL OF AMADOR: $7k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 14%DAVIS STREET COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%INTERFAITH COUNCIL OF AMADOR: $7k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $35k → 14%FOOD PANTRY OF DAVIS STREET FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $35k → 14%DAVIS STREET COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $35k → 14%DAVIS STREET COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.6M · 34 repeat orgs$5.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
26

Total granted

$8.6M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+32%

Still filing today

88%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +46%
  • AS
    Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition
    8× · 2017–2024 · $813k · revenue +141%
  • SB
    SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS
    3× · 2018–2022 · $471k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • DC
    DAVIS COMMUNITY MEALS
    one grant, 2021 · $1.8M · revenue -18%
  • NW
    Neighborhood Wellness Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $811k · revenue -20% · 49% of their budget
  • LIFELONG MEDICAL CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $200k · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
4
Project Open Hand

Project Open Hand's mission is to improve health outcomes and quality of life by providing nutritious meals to the sick and vulnerable, caring for and educating our community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Valley Vision

Valley vision is a civic leadership organization dedicated to improving the livability of the sacramento region. through research and action, we collaborate on bold, long-term solutions that improve people's lives.

Community Improvement
6
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
7
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
8
Sutter Coast Hospital

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services

Dedicated to assisting those in need by alleviating their immediate pain and problems and moving them toward self-sufficiency and financial independence.

—
10
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
11
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
12
Aliados Health

See schedule o.aliados health is a regional association of 17 community health centers with sites in marin, napa, sonoma, contra costa, solano, and yolo counties. the organization was formed in 1994. our mission is to improve access to,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Redwood Empire Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Rotts of Friends Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr11%18%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%43%20–35yr11%8%35–55yr13%32%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/78
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,900

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/69
Grantees still filing
48/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRESIDIO TR — $1,433,333 · OtherPRESIDIO TRREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $774,386 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR…Cristo Rey High School Sacramento — $257,500 · OtherCristo Rey High School SacramentoSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $217,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $175,000 · OtherCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE — $450,000 · OtherCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICIN…+29 more — $1,380,903 · Other+29 moreAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition — $812,500 · HealthAmbulatory Surgery Access C…MARCH OF DIMES INC — $685,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS — $471,180 · HealthSUTTER BAY HOSPITALSBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $460,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCCOALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE OF CALIFORNIA — $385,000 · HealthCOALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE…SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $247,023 · HealthSUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUND…LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE — $200,000 · HealthLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE+8 more — $247,994 · Health+8 moreDAVIS COMMUNITY MEALS — $1,750,000 · Housing & ShelterDAVIS COMMUNI…MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,271,328 · InternationalMEDSHARE I…Best Buddies International Inc — $100,000 · InternationalBest Buddi…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,015,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …The Davis Street Community Center Inc — $77,500 · Human ServicesThe Davis…Elk Grove Food Bank — $54,860 · Human ServicesTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $52,500 · Human Services+3 more — $53,610 · Human ServicesNeighborhood Wellness Foundation — $810,754 · Community ImprovementRIVER CITY FOOD BANK — $117,860 · Community ImprovementGREATER SACRAMENTO AREA ECONOMIC COUNCIL — $100,000 · Community ImprovementSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $249,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $157,360 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $125,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $115,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS — $75,860 · Food & NutritionYOLO FOOD BANK — $54,860 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $52,500 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $35,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$4,688,622Health$3,508,697Housing & Shelter$1,750,000International$1,371,328Human Services$1,253,470Community Improvement$1,028,614Food & Nutrition$865,580

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,271,328 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,015,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition — $812,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetNeighborhood Wellness Foundation — $810,754 over 1y, 49% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $685,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS — $471,180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $460,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE — $450,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE OF CALIFORNIA — $385,000 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetCristo Rey High School Sacramento — $257,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $249,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $247,023 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $217,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE — $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $175,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $157,360 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $125,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $125,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER CITY FOOD BANK — $117,860 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $115,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF THE GREATER VALLEY — $102,860 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER SACRAMENTO AREA ECONOMIC COUNCIL — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSF Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Pride Celebration Cmte — $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTRACY INTERFAITH MINISTRIES — $82,860 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetThe Davis Street Community Center Inc — $77,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS — $75,860 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO RUNNING ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElk Grove Food Bank — $54,860 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK — $54,860 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $52,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $52,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONTINA IMPACT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetValley Consortium for Medical Education — $46,243 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY CALIFORNIA — $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSEROTONIN SURGE CHARITIES CO JOHN CHUCK — $37,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetINTERFAITH COUNCIL OF AMADOR — $26,860 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetNATION'S FINEST — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGALLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sutter Valley Hospita…Dignity HealthThe Albertsons Compan…Sacramento Region Com…The PG&E Corporation …The California Endowm…California Associatio…East Bay Community Fo…Sutter Bay HospitalsCalifornia Foundation…California Healthcare…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA32.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Dignity Health · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · The PG&E Corporation Foundation · The California Endowment · California Association of Food Banks · East Bay Community Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · California Healthcare Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sutter Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines