Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sun Hill Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Environment$1.1MEducation$342kInternational$120kReligion$110kArts & Culture$65kHealth$26kRecreation & Sports$20kFood & Nutrition$16kOther$0
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST John Historical Society$25,000
Riverkeeper Inc$25,000
Save the Sound$20,000
Connecticut Fund for the Environment$20,000
Friends Seminary$20,000
City Harvest$5,000
Natural Resources Defense Council$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Charity Navigator: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CO
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 34 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 28 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
14

Total granted

$1.7M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+43%

Still filing today

62%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationEnvironmentInternationalHealthFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    RIVERKEEPER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $354k · revenue +34%
  • ST
    SAVE THE SOUND
    6× · 2017–2022 · $285k · revenue +53%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $220k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • HU
    Howard Unversity School of Medicine
    one grant, 2018 · $31k
  • BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $26k · revenue +38%
  • GC
    GOWANUS CANAL CONSERVANCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +108%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bank Street College of Education and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Land Conservation Organizat…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Food Pantries & AssistanceChristian Missionary Organi…Hospice Care Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr19%13%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,726

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
27/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RIVERKEEPER INC — $354,420 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INCSAVE THE SOUND — $285,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUNDNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $220,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC+5 more — $66,020 · Environment+5 moreIndividual grant recipient — $110,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS SEMINARY — $100,000 · OtherFRIENDS SEMINARYST John Historical Society — $50,000 · OtherST John Historical SocietySuny Oneonta — $35,000 · OtherSuny OneontaHoward Unversity School of Medicine — $31,298 · OtherHoward Unversity School of MedicineHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION — $30,000 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITU…City Tech Foundation (CUNY) — $25,208 · OtherPace University Law School — $25,000 · OtherPEACE CORPS — $21,748 · OtherNew York University School Of Medicine — $21,123 · OtherRISING TREETOPS AT OAKHURST — $20,000 · Other+11 more — $80,174 · Other+11 moreMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC — $37,000 · EducationMONMOUTH U…BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $25,873 · EducationBANK STREE…SKIDMORE COLLEGE — $22,557 · EducationSKIDMORE C…Vermont Law School — $20,000 · EducationVermont La…JUNIATA COLLEGE — $17,500 · EducationJUNIATA CO…Cornell University — $15,000 · EducationCornell Un…HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $12,389 · EducationHOFSTRA UN…PACE UNIVERSITY — $8,062 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $85,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,000 · International+2 more — $3,000 · InternationalCITY HARVEST INC — $16,000 · Food & NutritionPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $6,000 · HealthEMPIRE DRAGONS NYC INC — $5,000 · HealthFINAL EXIT NETWORK INC — $1,000 · HealthKNOWLEDGE ECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · Social Science
Environment$925,440Other$549,551Education$163,381International$93,000Food & Nutrition$16,000Health$12,000Social Science$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIVERKEEPER INC — $354,420 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND — $285,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $220,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC — $37,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $25,873 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $22,557 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISING TREETOPS AT OAKHURST — $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVermont Law School — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNewtown Creek Alliance Incorporated — $17,520 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetJUNIATA COLLEGE — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC — $12,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $12,389 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKNOWLEDGE ECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY — $8,062 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOWANUS CANAL CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNew York University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMPIRE DRAGONS NYC INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBRIDGEWATER SUSTAINABLE EARTH FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEnvironmental Law Institute — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE
  • Who funds RISING TREETOPS AT OAKHURST
  • Who funds Vermont Law School
  • Who funds Newtown Creek Alliance Incorporated
  • Who funds JUNIATA COLLEGE
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC
  • Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds KNOWLEDGE ECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES
  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds GOWANUS CANAL CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds EMPIRE DRAGONS NYC INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sun Hill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Save the Sound37% of income from government
  • Vermont Law School14% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sun Hill Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sun Hill Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph