Skip to content
Stull Family Foundation Kyoko Katayama at a glance

· Private foundation

Stull Family Foundation Kyoko Katayama

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$24kHealth$17kScience & Tech$14kFood & Nutrition$13kCivil Rights$8kEnvironment$7kAnimals$6kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$363k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN FOR WOMEN$2,000
COCOA PACKS INC$2,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM$1,030
Individual grant recipient$856
SECOND HARVEST FARMLAND$855
WALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER$700
GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN$600
OXFAM AMERICA$600
THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$535
OPEN ARMS$531
CLEAN AIR TASKFORCE$529
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MN$517
BUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$500
INDIAN LAND TRUST FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MN: $517 → 14%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $600 → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $600 → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $600 → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $535 → 11%OPEN ARMS: $531 → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 11%OPEN ARMS: $200 → 11%OPEN ARMS: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
PA
CA
KS
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 35 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
8

Total granted

$85k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+43%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • WC
    WALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +16%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • PS
    PROJECT STREET VET
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • TM
    THE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +60%
  • WF
    WALK FOR CLEAN WATER
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
3
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
4
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
5
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
6
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
9
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
10
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
11
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
12
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Street Vet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOMEN FOR WOMEN: $9,600 · OtherWOMEN FOR WOMENIndividual grant recipient: $4,556 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD PF MN: $3,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD PF MNINDIAN LAND TRUST FUND: $2,900 · OtherINDIAN LAND TRUST FUNDCOMMUNITY VETERINARY OUTREACH USA: $2,750 · OtherCOMMUNITY VETERINARY OUTREACH USAIndividual grant recipient: $2,323 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGRAMEEN FDN FREDDOM FROM HUNGER: $2,000 · OtherWALK FOR CLEAN WATER: $1,500 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,709 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVEPROJECT STREET VET: $1,750 · OtherALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC: $1,700 · OtherTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,600 · Other+11 more: $6,980 · Other+11 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,200 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $3,600 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INCBUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,300 · InternationalBUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONP…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,210 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCSEVA FOUNDATION: $2,600 · InternationalSEVA FOUNDATIONTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $2,400 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTIST…WELLSHARE INTERNATIONAL: $2,200 · InternationalWELLSHARE INTERNATIONALONE ACRE FUND: $2,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $1,224 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,030 · International+3 more: $1,507 · International+3 moreWALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $4,200 · HealthWALK-IN C…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,856 · HealthPARTNERS …CANCER LEGAL CARE: $1,221 · HealthCANCER LE…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $400 · HealthSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $4,755 · Food & NutritionCOCOA PACKS INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionThe Family Partnership: $3,335 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $931 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA: $517 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,930 · Crime & LegalCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $2,129 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $603 · Environment
Other$43,368International$27,271Health$7,677Food & Nutrition$6,755Human Services$4,783Crime & Legal$3,930Environment$2,732

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $4,755 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $4,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,930 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $3,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Partnership: $3,335 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,210 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,709 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $2,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSHARE INTERNATIONAL: $2,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $2,129 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,856 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT STREET VET: $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $1,224 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER LEGAL CARE: $1,221 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $931 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $603 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetECHO Inc: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA: $517 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL: $407 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST SIDE FREEDOM LIBRARY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds WALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Family Partnership ↗
  • Who funds BUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds SEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSHARE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds COCOA PACKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT STREET VET ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER LEGAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ECHO Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitabl…Saint Paul & Minnesot…The Minneapolis Found…Otto Bremer TrustHeadwaters Foundation…Minnesota Community F…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Raymond James Charita…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…
Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL21.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Minnesota Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stull Family Foundation Kyoko Katayama funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stull Family Foundation Kyoko Katayama. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stull Family Foundation Kyoko Katayama’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home