· Private foundation
Stuart Griffin Perlitz Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAINT PETER THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC | $15,000 |
| PRISON FELLOWSHIP ACADEMY | $5,500 |
| BENEDICTINE SISTERS | $5,000 |
| HILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CENTER | $5,000 |
| DOMINICAN SISTERS | $5,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO | $5,000 |
| SAINT PETER UPON THE WATER | $3,000 |
| KENDALL COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER | $2,500 |
| TRANSFORMATION HOUSE | $2,500 |
| HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD | $2,500 |
| HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES | $2,500 |
| CATHOLIC DAUGHTERS OF AMERICA | $2,500 |
| HILL COUNTRY MISSION FOR HEALTH | $2,500 |
| AID THE SILENT 98 | $2,500 |
| CHRISTIAN JOB CORP OF KENDALL COUNT | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER5× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +69%
- HCHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD6× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +39%
- ATAID THE SILENT4× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +292%
Funded once
- BSBENEDICTINE SISTERS OF BOERNEone grant, 2017 · $5k
- MKMSGR KELLY HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $5k
- LRLIVING ROCK ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the school is to provide a distinctive classical and christ-centered education that prepares students for servant-leadership and lives that glorify god.
To educate, motivate and disciple students in a christ-centered environment. new braunfels christian academy exists to help families raise their children to use their god-given gifts to the utmost potential.
Providing a biblically based, christ-centered education for students of all academic abilities, developing their full potential and inspiring them to live for the glory of god. we are a christian school serving special needs kids.
To educate children academically and spiritually to be charactered, community-minded young people.
To provide an academic and spiritual environment that builds the minds and faith of the preschool, kindergarten and primary school grade levels.
The school's mission is to enable students to devlop outstanding academic skills in a safe, nurturing, christian environment.
The mission of two dimensions preparatory academy charter school is to develop knowledgeable reasoning and lifelong learners through a dynamic and challenging educational program of excellence.
Provide quality care and enriching experiences for children in a warm christ-centered daycare environment.
Provide education for grades 1-12 based on the christian principles of the american and canadian reformed church.
To encourage personal spiritual development in the christian faith.
In a faith-based preparatory environment, incarnate word high school prepares confident young women dedicated to academic excellence, christian service and social justice.
A fully accredited christian school in the north houston area that uses the classical model to train pre-k through 12th grade students to impact their culture for christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hill Country Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Dynamic Catholic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD ↗
- Who funds AID THE SILENT ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY MISSION FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds KENDALL COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds OBLATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY ↗
- Who funds Transformation House ↗
- Who funds GREYSTONE PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING ROCK ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BRACKEN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF BULVERDE ↗
- Who funds GLORIA DEO ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BENEDICTINE MINISTRIES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Theta Lambda Alumni Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds K STAR INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Perry & Ruby Stevens Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · The Gvtc Foundation Inc · San Antonio Area Foundation · The Muller Family Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · The Church in Your City · Cb and Anita Branch Trust James L Drought Trustee · Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation & Fd Mgmt Trust · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stuart Griffin Perlitz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.