· Public charity
Strong City Baltimore Inc
Strong city baltimore takes a holistic approach to build and strengthening neighborhoods and people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 27 grants below total $373,293 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $412,268 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $38,975 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k11 grants · $65k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $145k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $164k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NIHNIAID | $100,000 |
| FUSION PARTNERSHIPS INC | $63,500 |
| PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC | $12,500 |
| BALTIMORE BAR FOUNDATION INC | $12,500 |
| CIVIC WORKS | $10,000 |
| MTM FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PROJECT PLASE INC | $10,000 |
| DENT EDUCATION INC | $10,000 |
| PURPOSE DRIVEN JOURNEY INC | $10,000 |
| SOCIAL GOOD FUND | $10,000 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS INC | $10,000 |
| IT TAKES ONE INC | $10,000 |
| GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC | $10,000 |
| ROB'S BARBERSHIP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| WELLNESS ALLY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $283k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY2× · 2017–2018 · $28k · revenue +64%- HLHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION2× · 2018–2019 · $12k · revenue +203%
- CFCHILL FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- CFCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $38k · revenue +70%
- EBEUBIE BLAKE NATIONAL JAZZ INSTITUTE & CULTURAL CENTERone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +21%
- WAWIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +329%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
Founded in 2001, gbca is a leading nonprofit provider of services to artists and cultural organizations in the region. (see schedule o)
Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…
Baltimore Action Legal Team is dedicated to pursuing creative, community-driven solutions and movement-oriented lawyering to support the Baltimore community.
The mission of baltimore community lending is supporting the revitalization and strengthening of underserved communities in the greater baltimore region through innovative financial solutions and collaborative resources designed to promote…
The mission of the central baltimore partnership cbp is to galvanize the renaissance of the neighborhoods of central baltimore, creating a diverse, equitable community where everyone can thrive. the organization pursues its mission by…
The baltimore civic fund works to connect government and philanthropy to improve residents' quality of life. our mission is to expand access to the critical assets, resources, and opportunities necessary to ensure the vitality of…
The baltimore development corporation (bdc) is a non-profit organization that serves as the economic development agency for the city of baltimore. bdc's mission is to grow the city's economy in an inclusive, equitable manner by retaining,…
The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.
To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…
To advocate fair housing and improving tenant/landlord relations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greater Mondawmin Coordinating Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 13% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds EUBIE BLAKE NATIONAL JAZZ INSTITUTE & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds WIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE BAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BELOVED COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ANEW INSPIRED CHANGE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ROBS BARBERSHOP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT PLASE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER MONDAWMIN COORDINATING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CIVIC WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds ELIJAHS BLESSING COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MTM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CORNER COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DENT EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS EVERY DAY INC ↗
- Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER BALTIMORE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · Robert W Deutsch Foundation · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Strong City Baltimore Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Baltimore Tree Trust Inc — 100% of income from government
- Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
- Project Plase Inc — 39% of income from government
- Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
- Baltimore Bar Foundation Inc — 23% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
- Arts Every Day Inc — 4% of income from government
- Access Art Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Beloved Community Services Corporation — 3% of income from government
- Wide Angle Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Chill Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.