Skip to content

North Carolina · Private foundation

Stonecutter Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$820k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2026
17
Organizations funded FY2025
12%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$410,975
Organizations funded a year
12 to 21
FY2021 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
3
Total assets, FY2026
$8.5M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 12% of the organizations Stonecutter Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving16$820k25%
FY202517$661k12%
FY202421$652k33%
FY202318$675k44%
FY202218$526k61%
FY202112$574kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Housing & Shelter$2.1MArts & Culture$580kEducation$546kCommunity Improvement$327kReligion$53kEnvironment$30kInternational$25kHuman Services$25kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 22 grantees
All grantees of Stonecutter Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Rutherford Housing Partnership Inc$620,283619%
Hatch AVL Foundation$247,250586%
Trinity School Inc$151,48064%
Gardner-Webb University$125,00030%
Schiele Museum of Natural History and Planetarium$105,00052%
The Symphony of Rutherford County$50,440343%
App School Foundation$50,0001n/a
Lake Lure Flowering Bridge$30,000310%
Mars Hill University$30,00030%
Rutherford County Visual Artists Guild$25,550324%
Open Doors of Asheville Inc$17,0001n/a
Globalgiving Foundation Inc$15,00030%
Rutherford Quilt Guild Inc$10,0002n/a
Pisgah Legal Services$10,00010%
Blue Ridge Hope$10,00012%
Earl Scruggs Music Festival Inc$8,0001n/a
Discovery Place Inc$7,50030%
Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc$6,0001n/a
Town of Rutherfordton$5,0001n/a
Montreat College$5,00010%
Buncombe Alternatives Inc$5,00011%
Foothills Credit Counseling Inc$5,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 22 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.4M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Stonecutter Foundation Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 15 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRutherford Housing Partnership Inc: $620,283 over 6y, 19% of budgetHatch AVL Foundation: $247,250 over 5y, 86% of budgetTrinity School Inc: $151,480 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetGardner-Webb University: $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSchiele Museum of Natural History and Planetarium: $105,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetThe Symphony of Rutherford County: $50,440 over 3y, 43% of budgetLake Lure Flowering Bridge: $30,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetMars Hill University: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRutherford County Visual Artists Guild: $25,550 over 3y, 24% of budgetGlobalgiving Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPisgah Legal Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Ridge Hope: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDiscovery Place Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMontreat College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBuncombe Alternatives Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Rhi Legacy Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Stonecutter Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stonecutter Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stonecutter Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Stonecutter Foundation Inc

How much does Stonecutter Foundation Inc give?
Stonecutter Foundation Inc reported 16 grants totaling $820,095 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 21 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2025.
What does Stonecutter Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2026, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (55%), Arts & Culture (15%), Education (14%).
Who are Stonecutter Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2026: Rutherford Housing Partnership Inc ($620k), Hatch AVL Foundation ($247k), Trinity School Inc ($151k).
Does Stonecutter Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 12% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Stonecutter Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Stonecutter Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc, Dogwood Health Trust, The Cannon Foundation Inc.
Where is Stonecutter Foundation Inc based?
Stonecutter Foundation Inc is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stonecutter’s filings →

More from the funding graph