Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stablein Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$235k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$363kHuman Services$253kHealth$135kArts & Culture$100kEnvironment$50kPublic Benefit$45kCommunity Improvement$25kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Peace Island Childrens Center$100,000
Mpala Research Center$20,000
Savory Institute$20,000
Undue Medical Debt$10,000
Red Oak Hope$10,000
Central Texas Food Bank$10,000
Patapsco Heritage Greenway Inc$10,000
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank$10,000
Dig Deep$10,000
Inspira Dance$10,000
I Support the Girls$10,000
Lily and Blair Foundation$5,000
Womens Center & Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP Medical Debt: $10k → 13%She's the first: $10k → 17%Baltimore Jewelry Center: $20k → 19%Womens Center & Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh: $10k → 11%Modest Needs Foundation: $15k → 17%One Simple Wish: $10k → 11%Baltimore Jewelry Center: $20k → 19%Women's Center and Shelter: $10k → 11%Baltimore Jewelry Center: $20k → 19%Womens Center & Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$735k · 12 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$735k
$290k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+2%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionCivil RightsPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PEACE ISLAND CHILDRENS CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $343k · revenue +129% · 89% of their budget
  • BJ
    BALTIMORE JEWELRY CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +35%
  • ID
    Inspira Dance
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • PC
    PIC Center
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • JH
    JEVS HUMAN SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +42%
  • KW
    KINGS WAY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Technoserve Inc

Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.

International
4
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
5
Save the Children Federation Inc

Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.

International
6
Project Concern International

Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.

International
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth's mission is to empower everyone, everywhere, with the knowledge, inspiration, and opportunity to heal the Earth and reclaim our future.

Environment
9
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
10
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
12
Finca International Inc

FINCA ends poverty through sustainable and scalable solutions inspired by the insights and needs of people in the communities where they live and work.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is She's the First Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ranked Choice Voting for Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEACE ISLAND CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $342,500 · InternationalPEACE ISLAND CHILDRENS CENTER INC+3 more: $30,000 · International+3 morePIC Center: $99,500 · OtherPIC CenterDIG DEEP: $92,500 · OtherDIG DEEPJEVS HUMAN SERVICES: $35,000 · OtherJEVS HUMAN SERVICESKINGS WAY INC: $25,000 · OtherKINGS WAY INCMpala Research Center: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherUrban Promise: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $90,000 · Other+10 moreBALTIMORE JEWELRY CENTER: $60,000 · Human ServicesBALTIMORE JEWELRY CEN…Alices Kids Inc: $35,000 · Human ServicesAlices Kids IncMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTI…WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $25,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SH…For the Girls Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesFor the Girls IncMODEST NEEDS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesMODEST NEEDS FOUNDATI…ONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSHE'S THE FIRST INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesInspira Dance: $40,000 · Arts & CultureSAVORY INSTITUTEORG INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentFAIRVOTE: $30,000 · Civil RightsCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
International$372,500Other$392,000Human Services$205,000Arts & Culture$40,000Environment$30,000Civil Rights$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEACE ISLAND CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $342,500 over 5y, 89% of budgetBALTIMORE JEWELRY CENTER: $60,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetInspira Dance: $40,000 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetJEVS HUMAN SERVICES: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlices Kids Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSAVORY INSTITUTEORG INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAIRVOTE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFor the Girls Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMODEST NEEDS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLISS KID YOGA: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRED OAK HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPATAPSCO HERITAGE GREENWAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHE'S THE FIRST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER RISING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stablein Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stablein Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stablein Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Stablein Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stablein Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph