Loading…
Loading…
Texas · Nonprofit
RANKED CHOICE VOTING FOR TEXAS (Texas) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $15,000 in grants to it, the largest being FAIRVOTE ACTION FUND ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
RANKED CHOICE VOTING FOR TEXAS runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,132 public benefit nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,132 public benefit nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of RANKED CHOICE VOTING FOR TEXAS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
RANKED CHOICE VOTING FOR TEXAS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
RANKED CHOICE VOTING FOR TEXAS draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Texas — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 1 states in all.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing