Skip to content

· Public charity

St Joseph Hospital of Orange

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$778k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$461k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$24MHousing & Shelter$861kHuman Services$566kPhilanthropy$83kCommunity Improvement$30kEducation$25k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $760,603, the rows itemized in this filing. The $778,492 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,889 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $280k
  • $250k+1 grant · $461k
$150,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$939M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS$460,603
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL FDN (FKA ST JOSEPH HERITAGE HEALTHCARE)$150,000
COUNCIL ON AGING ORANGE COUNTY$130,000
LATINO HEALTH ACCESS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $325k → 10%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $66k → 10%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $20k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING: $150k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING ORANGE COUNTY: $130k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING ORANGE COUNTY: $130k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $75k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING: $50k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $333k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 7 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against +59% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$25M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+59%

Still filing today

100%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $7.7M · revenue +142% · 26% of their budget
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    5× · 2018–2024 · $535k · revenue +73%
  • LH
    LATINO HEALTH ACCESS
    3× · 2020–2024 · $412k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IH
    Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $333k · revenue +112%
  • CH
    CAMINO HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $246k · revenue +55%
  • MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
2
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
3
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Health Center Partners of Southern California

Health center partners of southern california (formerly: council of community clinics) ("hcp") was established in 1977 as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.a premier consortium of primary healthcare organizations, hcp is an advocate for…

—
5
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
6
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
7
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
8
Aliados Health

See schedule o.aliados health is a regional association of 17 community health centers with sites in marin, napa, sonoma, contra costa, solano, and yolo counties. the organization was formed in 1994. our mission is to improve access to,…

Health
9
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
10
Ole Health

We provide high quality compassionate care to inspire everyone in our communities to lead a happier and healthier life.

Health
11
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
12
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Vital Access Care Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $15,454,800 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS: $7,705,944 · HealthST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS+8 more: $557,941 · HealthCOUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $535,000 · Human ServicesLATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $411,776 · Human ServicesIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $333,300 · Human ServicesJAMBOREE HOUSING CORPORATION: $377,476 · OtherCAMINO HEALTH CENTER: $245,915 · OtherSOUTHLAND INTEGRATED SERVICES INC: $40,000 · OtherASIAN AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE CENTER INC: $30,500 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherTALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS: $100,000 · EducationCSU FULLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION: $25,000 · EducationORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY: $83,333 · PhilanthropyONEOC: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Health$23,718,685Human Services$1,280,076Other$713,891Education$125,000Philanthropy$113,333

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $15,454,800 over 3y, 15% of budgetST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS: $7,705,944 over 7y, 26% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $535,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetLATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $411,776 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetJAMBOREE HOUSING CORPORATION: $377,476 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $333,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCAMINO HEALTH CENTER: $245,915 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $150,231 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS: $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOC OF OC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY: $83,333 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATION: $60,500 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER: $49,710 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHLAND INTEGRATED SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE CENTER INC: $30,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetONEOC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCSU FULLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLESTONNAC FREE CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOMS ORANGE COUNTY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County's United WayCA26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County's United Way · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · Sun Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Direct Relief · Charitable Ventures of Orange County · Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California · Oneoc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Joseph Hospital of Orange funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Joseph Hospital of Orange. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Joseph Hospital of Orange’s filings →

    More from the funding graph