How much did SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC reported 42 grants totaling $2,388,570 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC based?

SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC is based in TX.

SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC

The mission and purpose of the corporation is to operate exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code 1986, as amended (the "irc), and the texas tax code section 11.18, and also to perpetuate the abouve purposes in the event of dissolution by…

$2.4M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$300k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

food bankdallas

2023

honoradvocacydallas

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k25 grants · $542k
$50k–250k16 grants · $1.5M
$250k+1 grant · $300k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

POOL & HOT TUB FOUNDATION$300,000
ONE TRIBE FOUNDATION$202,500
LUKE'S WINGS$200,000
MINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE$200,000
THE SAMARITAN INN$125,000
CASA OF COLLIN CO$120,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$100,000
TEAM RUBICON$83,715
911 DAY$75,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$60,315
NESPA FOUNDATION$60,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$55,000
CARRY THE LOAD$55,000
PURPLE HEART HOMES$50,000
MOMENTOUS INSTITUTE$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $287k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$9.2M · 40 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.2M

$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%

+63%

Still filing today

45%

47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $343k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LUKE'S WINGS
6× · 2019–2024 · $898k · revenue +64%
MD
MINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE
6× · 2019–2024 · $700k · revenue +143%
TS
THE SAMARITAN INN
6× · 2019–2024 · $500k · revenue +95%

Funded once

NM
NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUMgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +2930%
TP
THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $129k · revenue +174%
ME
MCKINNEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

To advocate the interest and enhance the viability of hospitals in dallas, fort worth, and north texas and to strengthen the relationship of hospitals to the communities they serve

—

Memorial Hermann Community Benefit

Test and measure innovative solutions that promote good health for the individual, the health system and the community.

Social Science

Trees for Houston

Trees For Houston grows, plants and maintains trees throughout the greater Houston area.

—

Memorial Hermann Medical Group

MHMG provides primary care for thousands of Houston-area families. Committed to practicing evidence-based medicine and delivering patient care.

Health

Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

Annually, the Texas Business Hall of Fame inducts six transformational business leaders and funds an awards program for up to 40 entrepreneurial students in the higher education space, veteran company, high school business education space…

Community Improvement

Methodist Richardson Medical Center Foundation

To build and maintain donor relationships in order to raise, manage, and distribute funds to Methodist Health System.

—

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of

Easing the hardship of children's illness on families through programs that directly improve the health and wellbeing of children.

Health

Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

DARCC is committed to engaging and educating communities to prevent sexual violence and supporting survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services

Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—

Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hhm is a healthcare organization that provides medical, pediatric, women health, dental, vision, dietician, infectious disease prevention and treatment, and mental health services in dallas, tx and surrounding areas.

Health

United Food Bank

Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition

Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's Cancer Fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in North Texas.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minuteman Disaster Response and the most unlike its peers is Children's Medical Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/37

the rest of the field

13%

17,176/136,767

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

36 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

35/36

Grantees still filing

30/36

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$7,461,404Health$1,005,500Arts & Culture$1,000,000Public Safety & Disaster$700,000Philanthropy$418,625Human Services$286,802Education$235,055

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX17.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Love Life Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ONE HEART MCKINNEY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 204950273 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ONE HEART MCKINNEY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 71% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Srs Raise the Roof Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Srs Raise the Roof Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

36 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Srs Raise the Roof Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

36 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Srs Raise the Roof Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph