· Public charity
Srs Raise the Roof Foundation Inc
The mission and purpose of the corporation is to operate exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code 1986, as amended (the "irc), and the texas tax code section 11.18, and also to perpetuate the abouve purposes in the event of dissolution by…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k25 grants · $542k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| POOL & HOT TUB FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| ONE TRIBE FOUNDATION | $202,500 |
| LUKE'S WINGS | $200,000 |
| MINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE | $200,000 |
| THE SAMARITAN INN | $125,000 |
| CASA OF COLLIN CO | $120,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $100,000 |
| TEAM RUBICON | $83,715 |
| 911 DAY | $75,000 |
| FOLDS OF HONOR | $60,315 |
| NESPA FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| CARRY THE LOAD | $55,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $55,000 |
| PURPLE HEART HOMES | $50,000 |
| MOMENTOUS INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $343k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LUKE'S WINGS6× · 2019–2024 · $898k · revenue +66%- MDMINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $700k · revenue +284%
- MGMane Gait3× · 2022–2024 · $575k · revenue +112%
Funded once
- NMNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUMone grant, 2023 · $1.0M
- TPTHE PAT GREEN FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $129k · revenue ×34
- MEMCKINNEY EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +70%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans
U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…
To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To build and maintain donor relationships in order to raise, manage, and distribute funds to assist Methodist Health System in acquiring state-of-the-art technology, attracting excellent medical staff, and supporting vital hospital…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
The Medal of Honor Foundation's mission and purpose is to provide funds to support the Congressional Medal of Honor Society. In doing so, the Foundation supports the Society in advancing their mission to perpetuate the Medal of Honor's…
Tmf empowers veterans and families of fallen heroes to develop character in future generations.
To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minuteman Disaster Response Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LUKE'S WINGS ↗
- Who funds 22KILL ↗
- Who funds MINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mane Gait ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN INN INC ↗
- Who funds Pool & Hot Tub Foundation ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds 911 DAY ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARRY THE LOAD ↗
- Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas ↗
- Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds One Heart McKinney ↗
- Who funds MCKINNEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
- Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Love Life Foundation · Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas · Prism Foundation · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Synchrony Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Srs Raise the Roof Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.