Skip to content

· Private foundation

Srinivasa Manohara Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$423kEducation$197kInternational$64kFood & Nutrition$9kHuman Services$5kCommunity Improvement$5kHousing & Shelter$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $128k
$8,608
Median grant
3
States reached
$302k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$40,212
BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION$25,000
CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$25,000
CHINMAYA MISSION WEST$24,503
CHINMAYA MISSION BAKERSFIELD$13,707
HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY OF KERN COUNTY$8,608
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION USA$5,000
SHRI LAKSHMI NARAYAN MANDIR$1,252
DIRECT RELIEF$1,038
Individual grant recipient$501
RAVI & NAINA PATEL FOUNDATION$501
SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $501 → 13%FLOOD BAKERSFIELD MINISTRIES: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$585k · 15 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
27

Total granted

$585k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+20%

Still filing today

33%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $175k · revenue -10%
  • CM
    CHINMAYA MISSION BAKERSFIELD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $116k
  • HT
    HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $114k

Funded once

  • CM
    CHINMAYA MISSION WEST
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • HT
    HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY OF MALIBU
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • UO
    University of the Pacific
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kern County Cancer Foundation

Dedicated to assisting kern county residents who need financial assistance in obtaining treatment for cancer and associated diseases.

Health
2
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
3
Dinesh and Kalpana Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Shiv Nadar Foundation

Shiv Nadar Foundation provides access to higher education tounderprivileged students and funds to other charitable organizations to supporteducation, research, social policies for women empowerment, affordable healthcareservices, medical…

Education
5
Sai Spiritual Foundation

Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba

Religion
6
Karuna Foundation

Making distributions to individuals and organizations that advocate for and/or support the wellbeing of animals, our natural environment and all global citizens, particularly by addressing humanitarian crises or deficiencies in nutrition…

Animals
7
Khushii Usa Inc

The purpose of this corporation is to conduct activities through a holistic approach primarily for the benefit of disenfranchised children and their families in India and elsewhere in the world, including for the following specific…

International
8
Karuna-Shechen Usa

Karuna-shechen initiates and oversees projects that provide health care, education, and social services for the under-served populations of india, nepal, and tibet.

Philanthropy
9
University of California Berkeley Foundation

The university of california berkeley foundation's mission is to advance the interest and promote the welfare of the university of california, berkeley (the "university"), to develop and increase the facilities of the university and to…

Education
10
Khandekar Family Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
12
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dolores C Huerta Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
10/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHINMAYA MISSION BAKERSFIELD: $115,959 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION BAKERSFIELDHINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $114,380 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAHINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY OF KERN COUNTY: $64,945 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY OF KERN COUNTYSUGANA RELIGIOUS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $35,125 · OtherSUGANA RELIGIOUS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONCHINMAYA MISSION WEST: $25,000 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION WESTCHINMAYA MISSION WEST: $24,503 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION WEST+28 more: $69,512 · Other+28 moreBAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $175,000 · EducationBAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATIONCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,521 · EducationCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCUniversity of the Pacific: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $1,002 · EducationEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $5,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,576 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $1,539 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,035 · InternationalFLOOD BAKERSFIELD MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $501 · Human ServicesCITYSERVE INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $5,000 · Public BenefitDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementKERN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,001 · PhilanthropyRAVI AND NAINA PATEL FOUNDATION: $501 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$449,424Education$236,523International$9,150Human Services$5,501Public Benefit$5,000Community Improvement$5,000Philanthropy$2,002

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,521 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLOOD BAKERSFIELD MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETHANY SERVICES INC: $3,004 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,576 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $1,539 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT KERN COUNTY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,035 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKRISHNAMURTI FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $1,002 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKERN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAVI AND NAINA PATEL FOUNDATION: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHina Patel Foundation: $501 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $501 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC: $501 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
  • Who funds FLOOD BAKERSFIELD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds CITYSERVE INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds Chinmaya Mission Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT KERN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds KRISHNAMURTI FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds KERN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kern Community FoundationCA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kern Community Foundation · The California Endowment · Sempra Foundation · California Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Srinivasa Manohara Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Srinivasa Manohara Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Srinivasa Manohara Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Srinivasa Manohara Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Srinivasa Manohara’s filings →

More from the funding graph