Skip to content
Southlake Women's Club Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Southlake Women's Club Foundation

To raise funds to benefit local charities.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$185kHuman Services$124kHealth$73kFood & Nutrition$61kCrime & Legal$34kYouth Development$30kPhilanthropy$18kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$224k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WALNUT GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,500
DAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,500
OLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,500
DURHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL$6,500
JOHNSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,500
CARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,500
EUBANKS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL$6,500
CARROLL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Amys Wish With Wings: $5k → 11%GRACE: $9k → 11%Grapevine Relief & Comm Exchange: $9k → 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $8k → 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $5k → 11%What About Remembering Me Center: $5k → 11%Community Enrichment Center: $10k → 11%Community Enrichment Center: $9k → 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$542k · 22 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$542k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+60%

Still filing today

64%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SUMMER SANTA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +40%
  • WO
    Wings of a Butterfly
    3× · 2017–2019 · $29k · revenue +174%
  • MM
    METROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $28k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • MC
    MISC CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • KM
    KIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +15%
  • DI
    DUNHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
2
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
3
Texas Battered Women's Center Inc

Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.

Human Services
4
Trauma Support Services of North Texas

The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
7
Dfw Cares for Kids

Provide donated items to families

Community Improvement
8
Northeast Texas Child Advocacy Center Inc

To bring hope and healing while working together to break the cycle of child abuse.

Human Services
9
Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Serves abused children through a comprehensive approach to services for abused children and their families.

Crime & Legal
10
Your Harvest House

Harvest House exists to restore hope and dignity by equipping families to overcome crisis and build long-term stability. We do this by pairing practical resources with relational support and spiritual encouragement, so help becomes lasting…

—
11
Child Protective Services Community Partners Inc

Community Partners of Dallas is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing what abused and neglected children urgently need today to thrive tomorrow. Children access resources via their caseworker, and the agency works closely with…

Human Services
12
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Collin County Inc

CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) of Collin County speaks up for children who have been abused or neglected by empowering the community to volunteer as advocates for them in the court system. When the state steps in to protect a…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc; the most unlike its peers is I Can Still Shine Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOL: $64,800 · OtherCARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOLWings of a Butterfly: $28,500 · OtherWings of a ButterflyMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $27,500 · OtherMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INCCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC: $27,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INCI CAN STILL SHINE INC: $26,500 · OtherI CAN STILL SHINE INCDAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $24,600 · OtherDAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOLJOHNSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $24,600 · OtherJOHNSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLWALNUT GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $24,600 · OtherWALNUT GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLCARROLL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $24,600 · OtherCARROLL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLOLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $24,600 · OtherOLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOLEUBANKS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL: $24,600 · OtherEUBANKS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLDURHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL: $18,950 · OtherMISC CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS: $18,000 · OtherMID CITIES CHRISTMAS PROVIDERS: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $20,675 · OtherFAMILIES FOR EFFECTIVE AUTISM TREATMENT - NORTH TEXAS: $31,000 · HealthFAMILIES FOR EFFE…SUMMER SANTA: $30,000 · HealthSUMMER SANTACANCER CARE SERVICES: $26,000 · HealthCANCER CARE SERVI…Texas Health Resources Foundation: $5,500 · HealthTexas Health Reso…SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $19,250 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF …COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ENR…GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: $17,500 · Human ServicesGRAPEVINE REL…AMY'S WISH WITH WINGS: $5,000 · Human ServicesAMY'S WISH WI…WHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWHAT ABOUT RE…NORTH TEXAS SNAP INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNORTH TEXAS S…Carroll Education Foundation Inc: $18,000 · EducationGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $5,000 · EducationMIRACLE LEAGUE OF SOUTHLAKE: $15,445 · Recreation & SportsArts Council of Northeast Tarrant County: $10,000 · Arts & CultureKIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL: $7,500 · International
Other$394,525Health$92,500Human Services$70,750Education$23,000Recreation & Sports$15,445Arts & Culture$10,000International$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILIES FOR EFFECTIVE AUTISM TREATMENT - NORTH TEXAS: $31,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetSUMMER SANTA: $30,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $27,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetI CAN STILL SHINE INC: $26,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES: $26,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $19,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $19,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCarroll Education Foundation Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF SOUTHLAKE: $15,445 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetArts Council of Northeast Tarrant County: $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetKIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $5,025 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECTHANDUP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LADDER ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMY'S WISH WITH WINGS: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetWHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS SNAP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Textron Charitable Tr…Greater Keller Womens…Colleyville Woman's C…Sid W Richardson Foun…Thomas M Helen McKee …Community Foundation …Slocum Family Foundat…The Alcon Foundation …Amon G Carter Foundat…United Way of Tarrant…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX41.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc · Colleyville Woman's Club · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Slocum Family Foundation · The Alcon Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southlake Women's Club Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southlake Women's Club Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southlake Women's Club Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Southlake Women's Club Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southlake Women's Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home