· Public charity
Southcentral Workforce Investment Board
Our mission is to unlock the human talent that drives the development of businesses and individuals.we accomplish this by:1.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $206k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $912k
- $250k+2 grants · $7.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS | $7,108,611 |
| KNOVVA ACADEMY | $619,617 |
| HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY | $197,243 |
| CRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION | $160,299 |
| AUBERLE | $124,043 |
| MANUFACTURER'S ASSOCIATION OF | $121,040 |
| JUSTICEWORKS YOUTHCARE INC | $90,787 |
| CAPITAL REGION ECON DEVMT CORP | $59,533 |
| ENVOY ADVISORY LLC | $54,610 |
| BRAIDED RIVER COLLECTIVE | $53,513 |
| DEBBIE KAUFMAN | $50,474 |
| EMPLOYMENT SKILLS CENTER | $38,835 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CE | $35,000 |
| HARRISBURG REGIONAL CHAMBER | $35,000 |
| DREXEL UNIVERSITY | $22,258 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
46 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $369k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA8× · 2018–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +31%
- HUHARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY7× · 2019–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +3%
- MAMANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA8× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +145%
Funded once
- EWEquus Workforce Servicesone grant, 2018 · $815k
CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $310k · revenue +132%- TPTEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $240k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.
The pennsylvania chamber of business and industry is the largest broad-based business association in pennsylvania. thousands of members throughout the commonwealth employ greater than 50 percent of pennsylvania's private workforce.…
To provide programs and services that will develop a qualified workforce and competitive business community in northeast pennsylvania
To facilitate both the creation and retention of jobs within erie county and increase economic opportunities for individuals and businesses through comprehensive economic development programs.
To stimulate business and networking relations between europe and the cincinnati tri-state region through education, exchanges, trade missions, increasing awareness, enhancing the region and europe's image, providing information &…
Private industry council of centre county, inc. partners with business, government, and non-profit entities throughout central pa to build strong communities. this is accomplished by providing grants management, fiscal services, program…
The organization was created for the economic development of somerset county, pennsylvania, with it's mission to promote industrial, commercial and retail growth in the county by recruiting and assisting new firms to locate in the county,…
To be a catalyst that will actively promote and support responsible economic growth in the carlisle region, while continuing to provide enhanced benefits for our membership and a vibrant quality of life for our community.
None
The chamber of commerce for greater philadelphia (the chamber) brings area businesses and civic leaders together to promote growth and create opportunity in our region. our members represent eleven counties, three states, and roughly…
The Corporation was formed to recruit and promote new and existing industrial business to Muhlenberg County and immediate area .
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hanover Area Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is White Rose Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA ↗
- Who funds HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SEIU HEALTHCARE PA TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds TEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Partnership for Career Development ↗
- Who funds ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HARRISBURG REGIONAL CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE YORK COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR LEARNING ↗
- Who funds HANOVER AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds AUBERLE ↗
- Who funds LEBANON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EMPLOYMENT SKILLS CENTER ↗
- Who funds CUMBERLAND AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ADAMS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHAMBERSBURG CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · York County Community Foundation · Philadelphia Works Inc · Bucks County Workforce Development Board Inc · Partnership for Better Health · I Car Education Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Firstenergy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southcentral Workforce Investment Board funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.