Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

I Car Education Foundation

The I-car education foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting collision repair educational programs, schools, and students to create qualified, entry-level employees and connect them with an array of career opportunities.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Employment$1.9MEducation$251kScience & Tech$45kCrime & Legal$18k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $142,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,427,464 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,284,964 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ERIE 2 CHAUTAUQUA-CATTARAUGUS BOCES LOGUIDICE CENTER$25,000
LORENZO WALKER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$15,000
WARREN TECH$10,000
OXFORD HILLS TECHNICAL SCHOOL$10,000
DAUPHIN COUNTY TECHNICAL SCHOOL$10,000
NORWALK HIGH SCHOOL$7,500
NORTH DAKOTA STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE$5,000
STEEL CENTER AREA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL$5,000
TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF APPLIED TECHNOLOGY ELIZABETHTON$5,000
TABLE ROCK CAREER CENTER$5,000
ATLANTIC TECHNICAL CENTER$5,000
THOMAS A EDISON CAREER & TECHNICAL ACADEMYELIZABETH HIGH SC$5,000
SHERIDAN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$5,000
GREATER ALTOONA CAREER AND TECH$5,000
TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF APPLIED TECHNOLOGY- MORRISTOWN$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EAST VALLEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 11%MONTACHUSETT REGIONAL VO TECH HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 11%THADDEUS STEVENS COLLEGE: $10k → 9%CAREER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 11%LEBANON COUNTY CAREER CTR: $12k → 11%DAUPHIN COUNTY TECHNICAL SCHOOL: $10k → 12%CONTRA COSTA COLLEGE: $10k → 9%EL CAMINO COLLEGE: $10k → 14%NEW YORK AUTOMOTIVE & DIESEL INSTITUTE: $15k → 13%ERIE 2 CHAUTAUQUA-CATTARAUGUS BOCES LOGUIDICE CENTER: $25k → 18%COLLIN COLLEGE: $10k → 5%LOCKHART HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 15%JUDSON HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 16%TEXAS SOUTHMOST COLLEGE: $25k → 23%NORTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE: $20k → 13%LORENZO WALKER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 10%ETOWAH COUNTY CAREER TECHNICAL CENTER: $10k → 18%ROLLA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $10k → 16%CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECH COLLEGE: $25k → 12%NORTHWEST HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 11%CENTRAL PIEDMONT COMM COLLEGE: $12k → 10%STANLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10k → 13%WESTOVER HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 16%NEW ENGLAND INST OF TECH: $20k → 7%ETOWAH HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 6%PAULDING COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 8%MAXWELL HIGH SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 9%CHATTAHOOCHEE TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $15k → 11%LANIER TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $16k → 12%NORTH GEORGIA TECH COLLEGE: $10k → 14%ATHENS TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 27%WARREN TECH: $25k → 7%FT HAYES CAREER CENTER: $10k → 15%THORNTON FRACTIONAL CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: $25k → 14%GAITHERSBURG HIGH SCHOOL: $17k → 8%OXFORD HILLS TECHNICAL SCHOOL: $10k → 13%ASSABET VALLEY VOC TECH: $15k → 8%MONTACHUSETT REGIONAL VOC TECH HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 11%DAUPHIN COUNTY TECHNICAL SCHOOL: $10k → 12%CONTRA COSTA COLLEGE: $10k → 9%CATTARAUGUS ALLEGANY BOCES CTR AT ELLICOTTVILLE: $10k → 16%ETOWAH HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 6%MAXWELL HIGH SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY: $13k → 9%ETOWAH HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 6%ETOWAH HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 6%INTER-INDUSTRY CONFERENCE ON AUTO COLLISION REPAIR: $60k → 14%KENNEDY KING COLLEGE: $25k → 14%KENNEDY KING COLLEGE: $17k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 111 repeat orgs$456k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +118% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

111 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 95 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

111
100

Total granted

$1.8M
$436k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+28%

Still filing today

6%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONTRA COSTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +280%
  • NH
    NORWALK HIGH SCHOOL ATHELTIC BOOSTE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +118%
  • RT
    ROSEDALE TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $17k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTER-INDUSTRY CONFERENCE ON AUTO COLLISION REPAIRgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +28%
  • TS
    TEXAS SOUTHMOST COLLEGE DISTRICT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25k
  • NA
    NORTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for Florida Gateway College Inc

The foundation provides academic scholarships and financial support to the college.

Education
2
Dakota County Technical College Foundation

The dctc foundation's mission is to foster student success and elevate the academic experience at dakota county technical college by securing resources through strong partnerships with employers, alumni, and the community.

3
Columbia State Community College Foundation

The columbia state community college foundation encourages friends, alumni, economic partners and others to invest their time and resources toward improvement of education at columbia state community college and making higher education…

4
Mid-State Technical College Foundation Inc

Through the generosity of donors, the foundation invests in student success and supports mid-state technical college's strategic plan.

Education
5
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
6
Jefferson Community College Foundation Inc

The mission of the jefferson community college foundation is to work in partnership with the college, the community and alumni to enhance the educational opportunities provided by the college.

Education
7
Cape Cod Community College Educational Foundation Inc

The ccccef is a non-profit organization supporting the mission of cape cod community college, its students, its faculty, and its community endeavors, by raising and managing funds, encouraging endowments, and supporting the college's…

Education
8
Whatcom Community College Foundation

The wcc foundation strengthens educational opportunities by providing student scholarships, supporting faculty and staff development, and assisting with key college initiatives.

Education
9
Cankdeska Cikana Community College

To provide higher education opportunities, at the community college level, including vocational and technical training. as a tribal community college, we emphasize the teaching and learning of dakota culture and language toward the…

Education
10
Northeast State Community College Foundation

To promote the cause of higher education and the mission of northeast state community college; to expand educational opportunities; and to acquire, manage, and administer foundation funds to achieve those objectives.

Education
11
Central Community College Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission is to advance opportunities for quality educational services in nebraska-based institutions.

Education
12
Northcentral Technical College Foundation Inc

The ntc foundation develops relationships that enable individuals, businesses and the community to advocate for and provide resources in support of northcentral technical college in accomplishing its mission.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Contra Costa College Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Norwalk High School Atheltic Booste. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsSchool District FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%58%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.1%1/680
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,818,885

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
27/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+190 more — $2,146,202 · Other+190 moreNEW ENGLAND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $20,000 · EducationROSEDALE TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $16,750 · EducationAIMS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $13,000 · EducationHUDSON VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $8,000 · EducationCUESTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationLAKE TECHNICAL COLLEGE INC — $4,000 · EducationCOASTAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · EducationRanken Technical College — $2,800 · EducationNORWALK HIGH SCHOOL ATHELTIC BOOSTE — $17,500 · Crime & LegalUAW- Labor Employment and Training Corp — $5,000 · Employment
Other$2,146,202Education$72,550Crime & Legal$17,500Employment$5,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTER-INDUSTRY CONFERENCE ON AUTO COLLISION REPAIR — $60,202 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONTRA COSTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetNEW ENGLAND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORWALK HIGH SCHOOL ATHELTIC BOOSTE — $17,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetROSEDALE TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $16,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMORRISON R WAITE HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC — $14,500 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetAIMS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCUESTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUAW- Labor Employment and Training Corp — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE TECHNICAL COLLEGE INC — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetRanken Technical College — $2,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTER-INDUSTRY CONFERENCE ON AUTO COLLISION REPAIR
  • Who funds CONTRA COSTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds NORWALK HIGH SCHOOL ATHELTIC BOOSTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GenYOUTH IncorporatedIL70.9× affinity84 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GenYOUTH Incorporated · American Association of Community Colleges · Round It Up America Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · The George W Bush Foundation · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Action for Healthy Kids · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Share Our Strength · Save the Music Foundation · Reading Is Fundamental Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization I Car Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Lake Technical College Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph