Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day.

$116M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$4.3MReligion$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kHealth$432
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 26 grants below total $195,380 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $115,956,301 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $115,760,921 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDDLECREEK AREA COMMUNITY YMCA$51,000
SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH$20,628
CSO - CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA OPPORTUNITIES$20,000
SCCAP - GETTYSBURG$15,000
GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES$11,500
HARRISBURG BRETHREN IN CHRIST$11,500
REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD - LIVING SPRING$11,000
CORPUS CHRISTI CHURCH - SVDP$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY - FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
MIDDLETOWN INTERFAITH PANTRY$9,000
GRANTVILLE AREA FOOD PANTRY$5,000
PANTHER RAM NUTRIPACKS PROGRAM (SP)$4,000
KINGDOM EMBASSY$4,000
LEBANON COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$2,000
MARANATHA MINISTRIES$1,537
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROJECT SHARE: $7k → 8%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES - LITTLESTOWN: $24k → 9%THE CARING CUPBOARD JONESTOWN OUTREACH PANTRY: $13k → 11%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES - LITTLESTOWN: $5k → 9%SCCAP - GETTYSBURG: $15k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES - DILLSBURG: $25k → 9%THE REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER (KC): $7k → 10%SOUTH CENTRAL CAP INC: $10k → 9%MANOS UNIDAS HISPANIC AMERICAN CENTER INC: $6k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES - DILLSBURG: $25k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES MHF GRANT MOBILE PANTRY: $21k → 9%THE CARING CUPBOARD INC: $100k → 11%AGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE TO OUR COMMUNITY: $107k → 14%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES - HANOVER: $50k → 9%THE CARING CUPBOARD INC: $6k → 11%AGAPE (FE): $53k → 14%AGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE TO OUR COMMUNITY BLOOM (BPK): $6k → 14%AGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE TO OUR COMMUNITY: $6k → 14%SOUTH CENTRAL CAP - CHAMBERSBURG: $14k → 9%SOUTH CENTRAL CAP - CHAMBERSBURG: $10k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES NEW OXFORD: $25k → 9%SCCAP - CHAMBERSBURG: $10k → 9%MARANATHA FOOD PANTRY: $6k → 9%MARANATHA FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 9%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $25k → 16%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES LEMOYNE: $10k → 8%SP - POWER PACKS PROJECT: $7k → 9%FOOD BANK OF STATE COLLEGE AREA INC: $14k → 16%SP - POWER PACKS PROJECT: $7k → 9%CRISPUS ATTUCKS COMMUNITY CTR: $6k → 9%FOOD BANK OF STATE COLLEGE (SP): $5k → 16%UPPER DAUPHIN HSC INC: $5k → 12%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES DOVER: $50k → 9%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $10k → 12%SP - POWER PACKS PROJECT: $13k → 9%POWER PACKS PROJECT (SP): $8k → 9%LITITZ CHOOSES LOVE: $10k → 9%CAP (COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP): $30k → 9%CAP (COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP): $25k → 9%CAP - LANCASTER: $25k → 9%CAP - LANCASTER: $15k → 9%HARVEST OF BLESSING INC: $10k → 9%ALPHA & OMEGA COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 9%THE LOFT COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $37k → 9%THE LOFT COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 9%YMCA OF YORK AND YORK COUNTY SHREWSBURY AOG: $6k → 9%COMMUNITY CUPBOARD OF ELIZABETHTOWN: $25k → 9%PAXTON MINISTRIES: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 272 repeat orgs$260k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

272 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 252 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

272
133

Total granted

$4.1M
$246k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+28%

Still filing today

38%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationReligionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FIRST FRUITS FARM INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $278k · revenue +68%
  • YC
    YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $268k · revenue +165%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $256k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • CC
    CAMPUS CUPBOARD FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • LC
    Lancaster County Chooses Lovegraduated
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +307%
  • DD
    DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD
    3× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue -61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sullivan County Food Pantry

To provide access to food for low-income families in the Sullivan County community in order to alleviate food insecurity and to improve the overall health and well-being of those served.

Food & Nutrition
2
Narberth Community Food Bank

Providing food to the community from the food bank.

Food & Nutrition
3
Adams County Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
4
Corner Cupboard Food Bank Inc

To administer food grants programs, to solicit and distribute food through a county-wide network of food pantries in greene county, pa and to educate the public about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Human Services
5
The People Who Care Food Cupboard

The mission of the food cupboard is to nourish and feed those in our community who are unable to do so on their own primarily due to limited financial resources.

Food & Nutrition
6
The Pantry at Hamilton Mill Inc

The Pantry seeks to offer the Bread of Life to our community by providing quality food and building quality relationships rooted in the love ofJesus. Due to the strong need in our community, The Pantry at Hamilton Mill was created to…

Food & Nutrition
7
Collinsville Food Pantry

To provide, or make available, food products or other items to its patrons, donees, and/or beneficiaries.

Food & Nutrition
8
Manna On Main Street
9
Church Women United

Jesus commanded, "love your neighbor as yourself." (mark 12:31) our ministry provides loving service to the poor and hungry. the organization will operate an ecumenical food pantry to serve those who need food assistance in york county and…

10
West Chester Food Cupboard

The west chester food cupboard is one of the largest hunger relief agencies in chester county. we are the primary source of food assistance for low- income residents living in and around the west chester area school district. west chester…

Food & Nutrition
11
Healing Hunger Beaver County

To provide relief to those facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
12
Caring for Friends

Caring for friends, founded in 1974, is a food bank, prepared meals program, and caring kitchen. our mission is to provide food and friendship to seniors, kids and adults, the homeless, and those in shelter in greater philadelphia. we are…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster County Food Hub and the most unlike its peers is Shoebox Supply House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Education FoundationsSenior and Affordable Housi…Regional Economic Developme…Independent SchoolsVolunteer Fire & Rescue Ser…Youth Sports ProgramsHunting and Fishing ClubsCemetery Maintenance Associ…Health System NetworkAgricultural & Environmenta…Dog Rescue and CareCommunity Performing ArtsIndustry Trade AssociationsCommunity Swimming ClubsLocal History MuseumsEarly Childhood Care Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr16%33%35–55yr17%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%8%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr16%37%35–55yr17%13%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%11/823
the rest of the field
8%
1,176/15,334

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

382 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 382 of the 416 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
109
Early backer (in before they grew)
362/382
Grantees still filing
284/382
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $267,735 · OtherYORK COUNTY FOOD BANKTHE SALVATION ARMY — $108,618 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSOLANCO NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES — $105,000 · OtherSOLANCO NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIESWEST SNYDER RECREATION ASSOCIATION — $64,265 · Other+136 more — $1,319,187 · Other+136 moreNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $256,270 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INCAGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE TO OUR COMMUNITY — $177,701 · Human ServicesAGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE TO OUR…THE CARING CUPBOARD INC — $124,332 · Human ServicesTHE CARING CUPBOARD INCCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC — $100,980 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP…SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC — $58,676 · Human ServicesSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTI…THE LOFT COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $45,500 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC — $45,335 · Human ServicesPOWER PACKS PROJECT — $41,041 · Human Services+22 more — $174,554 · Human Services+22 moreFIRST FRUITS FARM INC — $277,500 · Food & NutritionFIRST FRUITS FARM INCCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK — $243,251 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BA…THE NEW LOVE CENTER — $237,064 · Food & NutritionTHE NEW LOVE CENTERFOOD FOR FAMILIES INC — $89,945 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR FAMILIES INCHARVEST FOOD PANTRY INC — $45,107 · Food & Nutrition+11 more — $127,573 · Food & Nutrition+11 moreCROSSNET MINISTRIES — $42,036 · ReligionLANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB — $34,048 · ReligionPARISH RESOURCE CENTER INC — $8,015 · ReligionSPANISH AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION FOR EQUALITY INC — $69,103 · Community ImprovementNORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC — $3,311 · Community ImprovementHANNA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $12,852 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN — $10,738 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION — $4,118 · PhilanthropyFOR THE CAUSE INC — $3,350 · PhilanthropyTHE FACTORY MINISTRIES — $10,760 · Youth DevelopmentSNYDER COUNTY COALITION FOR KIDS — $6,143 · Youth DevelopmentLEWISTOWN UNITED MINISTRIES IN NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION — $5,919 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHAMBERSBURG AND SHIPPENSBURG INC — $3,668 · Youth DevelopmentMEDARDS HOUSE — $3,629 · Youth Development
Other$1,864,805Human Services$1,024,389Food & Nutrition$1,020,440Religion$84,099Community Improvement$72,414Philanthropy$31,058Youth Development$30,119

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIRST FRUITS FARM INC — $277,500 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $267,735 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $256,270 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK — $243,251 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEW LOVE CENTER — $237,064 over 8y, 26% of budgetAGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE TO OUR COMMUNITY — $177,701 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetTHE CARING CUPBOARD INC — $124,332 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC — $100,980 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR FAMILIES INC — $89,945 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetSPANISH AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION FOR EQUALITY INC — $69,103 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetWEST SNYDER RECREATION ASSOCIATION — $64,265 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC — $58,676 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLEBANON COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES — $58,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetTHE LOFT COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $45,500 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC — $45,335 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHARVEST FOOD PANTRY INC — $45,107 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetCROSSNET MINISTRIES — $42,036 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetPOWER PACKS PROJECT — $41,041 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetEPHRATA AREA SOCIAL SERVICES — $34,716 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB — $34,048 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA OPPORTUNITIES INC — $30,025 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED CHURCHES ELIZABETHTOWN AREA — $27,196 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS — $26,392 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetSHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH — $25,497 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetFulton County Food Basket Inc — $25,436 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetYORK BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION — $24,211 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA — $23,304 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTOWANDA AREA CHRISTIAN OUTREACH — $20,671 over 9y, 13% of budgetJUNIATA COUNTY FOOD PANTRY — $19,586 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetMASON-DIXON COMMUNITY SERVICES — $15,413 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetHARVEST OF BLESSING INC — $14,144 over 9y, 12% of budgetMANSFIELD FOOD PANTRY — $13,500 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetBRIGHT SIDE OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATI — $13,350 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHANNA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $12,852 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetMARANATHA MINISTRY INC — $12,537 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMONFOOD INC — $12,150 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetPROJECT SHARE OF CARLISLE — $11,465 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBOR HELPING NEIGHBOR FOOD BANK INC — $10,938 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FACTORY MINISTRIES — $10,760 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN — $10,738 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLancaster County Chooses Love — $10,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD — $9,587 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES — $8,903 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWAYNESBORO COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES IN — $8,883 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetANCHOR LANCASTER — $8,822 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetBedford Food Outreach Inc — $8,803 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetALTOONA FOOD BANK — $8,643 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetSt Vincent de Paul Altoona-Johnstown — $8,415 over 9y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIRST FRUITS FARM INC
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK
  • Who funds THE NEW LOVE CENTER
  • Who funds AGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE TO OUR COMMUNITY
  • Who funds THE CARING CUPBOARD INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC
  • Who funds FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds SPANISH AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION FOR EQUALITY INC
  • Who funds WEST SNYDER RECREATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds LEBANON COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE LOFT COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC
  • Who funds HARVEST FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds CROSSNET MINISTRIES
  • Who funds POWER PACKS PROJECT
  • Who funds EPHRATA AREA SOCIAL SERVICES
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB
  • Who funds CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA OPPORTUNITIES INC
  • Who funds UNITED CHURCHES ELIZABETHTOWN AREA
  • Who funds CHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS
  • Who funds SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH
  • Who funds Fulton County Food Basket Inc
  • Who funds Join Hands Ministry Inc
  • Who funds YORK BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA
  • Who funds TOWANDA AREA CHRISTIAN OUTREACH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Aid IncPA93.7× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Aid Inc · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Lancaster County Community Foundation · Tuscarora Wayne Mutual Foundation · United Way of the Capital Region · First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · York County Food Bank · United Way of Lancaster County · Partnership for Better Health · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Community Giving Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Central Pennsylvania Food Bank funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 26%
  • First Fruits Farm Inc26% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 416 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph