· Public charity
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $195,380 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $115,956,301 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $115,760,921 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIDDLECREEK AREA COMMUNITY YMCA | $51,000 |
| SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH | $20,628 |
| CSO - CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA OPPORTUNITIES | $20,000 |
| SCCAP - GETTYSBURG | $15,000 |
| GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES | $11,500 |
| HARRISBURG BRETHREN IN CHRIST | $11,500 |
| REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD - LIVING SPRING | $11,000 |
| CORPUS CHRISTI CHURCH - SVDP | $10,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY - FAMILY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| MIDDLETOWN INTERFAITH PANTRY | $9,000 |
| GRANTVILLE AREA FOOD PANTRY | $5,000 |
| PANTHER RAM NUTRIPACKS PROGRAM (SP) | $4,000 |
| KINGDOM EMBASSY | $4,000 |
| LEBANON COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES | $2,000 |
| MARANATHA MINISTRIES | $1,537 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
272 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 252 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFIRST FRUITS FARM INC4× · 2017–2020 · $278k · revenue +68%
- YCYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK8× · 2018–2025 · $268k · revenue +165%
- NHNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $256k · revenue +105%
Funded once
- CCCAMPUS CUPBOARD FOOD PANTRYone grant, 2023 · $25k
- LCLancaster County Chooses Lovegraduated3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +307%
- DDDOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD3× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue -61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide access to food for low-income families in the Sullivan County community in order to alleviate food insecurity and to improve the overall health and well-being of those served.
Providing food to the community from the food bank.
To administer food grants programs, to solicit and distribute food through a county-wide network of food pantries in greene county, pa and to educate the public about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.
The mission of the food cupboard is to nourish and feed those in our community who are unable to do so on their own primarily due to limited financial resources.
The Pantry seeks to offer the Bread of Life to our community by providing quality food and building quality relationships rooted in the love ofJesus. Due to the strong need in our community, The Pantry at Hamilton Mill was created to…
To provide, or make available, food products or other items to its patrons, donees, and/or beneficiaries.
Jesus commanded, "love your neighbor as yourself." (mark 12:31) our ministry provides loving service to the poor and hungry. the organization will operate an ecumenical food pantry to serve those who need food assistance in york county and…
The west chester food cupboard is one of the largest hunger relief agencies in chester county. we are the primary source of food assistance for low- income residents living in and around the west chester area school district. west chester…
To provide relief to those facing food insecurity.
Caring for friends, founded in 1974, is a food bank, prepared meals program, and caring kitchen. our mission is to provide food and friendship to seniors, kids and adults, the homeless, and those in shelter in greater philadelphia. we are…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster County Food Hub and the most unlike its peers is Shoebox Supply House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
382 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 382 of the 416 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIRST FRUITS FARM INC ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE NEW LOVE CENTER ↗
- Who funds AGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE TO OUR COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds THE CARING CUPBOARD INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds SPANISH AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION FOR EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds WEST SNYDER RECREATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds LEBANON COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE LOFT COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC ↗
- Who funds HARVEST FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSNET MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds POWER PACKS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds EPHRATA AREA SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHURCHES ELIZABETHTOWN AREA ↗
- Who funds CHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds Fulton County Food Basket Inc ↗
- Who funds Join Hands Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds YORK BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA ↗
- Who funds TOWANDA AREA CHRISTIAN OUTREACH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Aid Inc · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Lancaster County Community Foundation · Tuscarora Wayne Mutual Foundation · United Way of the Capital Region · First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · York County Food Bank · United Way of Lancaster County · Partnership for Better Health · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Community Giving Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Central Pennsylvania Food Bank funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- First Fruits Farm Inc — 26% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.