Skip to content

· Public charity

Southcentral Workforce Investment Board

Our mission is to unlock the human talent that drives the development of businesses and individuals.we accomplish this by:1.

$8.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Employment$44MYouth Development$7.4MHuman Services$4.1MEducation$3.6MCommunity Improvement$838kHousing & Shelter$532kHealth$225kMembership Benefit$203kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $206k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $912k
  • $250k+2 grants · $7.7M
$50,474
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS$7,108,611
KNOVVA ACADEMY$619,617
HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY$197,243
CRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION$160,299
AUBERLE$124,043
MANUFACTURER'S ASSOCIATION OF$121,040
JUSTICEWORKS YOUTHCARE INC$90,787
CAPITAL REGION ECON DEVMT CORP$59,533
ENVOY ADVISORY LLC$54,610
BRAIDED RIVER COLLECTIVE$53,513
DEBBIE KAUFMAN$50,474
EMPLOYMENT SKILLS CENTER$38,835
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CE$35,000
HARRISBURG REGIONAL CHAMBER$35,000
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$22,258
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AUBERLE: $124k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
UT
KY
VA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58M · 46 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
52

Total granted

$58M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+27%

Still filing today

43%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $369k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementEmploymentHealthMembership BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +31%
  • HU
    HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +3%
  • MA
    MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • EW
    Equus Workforce Services
    one grant, 2018 · $815k
  • CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $310k · revenue +132%
  • TP
    TEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $240k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional Workforce Collaborative - Swpa

To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.

Community Improvement
2
Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry

The pennsylvania chamber of business and industry is the largest broad-based business association in pennsylvania. thousands of members throughout the commonwealth employ greater than 50 percent of pennsylvania's private workforce.…

—
3
Northeast Pennsylvania Manufacturers and Employers Council Inc

To provide programs and services that will develop a qualified workforce and competitive business community in northeast pennsylvania

Employment
4
Greater Erie Economic Development Corporation
—
5
Erie County Economic Development Charitable Fund

To facilitate both the creation and retention of jobs within erie county and increase economic opportunities for individuals and businesses through comprehensive economic development programs.

—
6
European-American Chamber of Commerce

To stimulate business and networking relations between europe and the cincinnati tri-state region through education, exchanges, trade missions, increasing awareness, enhancing the region and europe's image, providing information &…

Community Improvement
7
Private Industry Council of Centre County Inc

Private industry council of centre county, inc. partners with business, government, and non-profit entities throughout central pa to build strong communities. this is accomplished by providing grants management, fiscal services, program…

Employment
8
Somerset County Economic Developmen Council

The organization was created for the economic development of somerset county, pennsylvania, with it's mission to promote industrial, commercial and retail growth in the county by recruiting and assisting new firms to locate in the county,…

—
9
Greater Carlisle Area Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst that will actively promote and support responsible economic growth in the carlisle region, while continuing to provide enhanced benefits for our membership and a vibrant quality of life for our community.

—
10
Northeastern Pennsylvania Industrial Res Resource Center Inc

None

Community Improvement
11
Chamber of Commerce for Greater Philadephia

The chamber of commerce for greater philadelphia (the chamber) brings area businesses and civic leaders together to promote growth and create opportunity in our region. our members represent eleven counties, three states, and roughly…

—
12
Muhlenberg Economic Growth Alliance

The Corporation was formed to recruit and promote new and existing industrial business to Muhlenberg County and immediate area .

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hanover Area Chamber of Commerce; the most unlike its peers is White Rose Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS: $26,833,090 · OtherEQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONSEDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC: $15,572,396 · OtherEDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INCLANCASTER-LEBANON INT UNIT #13: $2,410,495 · Other+82 more: $7,181,335 · Other+82 moreCRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA: $3,959,510 · Housing & ShelterHARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: $2,328,043 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $739,426 · EducationTHE YORK COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR LEARNING: $161,849 · Education+4 more: $167,143 · EducationTEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION: $239,964 · Community ImprovementHARRISBURG REGIONAL CHAMBER: $181,167 · Community ImprovementYORK COUNTY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE: $178,700 · Community ImprovementLEBANON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $106,500 · Community ImprovementCUMBERLAND AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $75,350 · Community ImprovementWHITE ROSE COLLECTIVE: $53,513 · Community Improvement+1 more: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $310,000 · EmploymentPartnership for Career Development: $211,196 · EmploymentCOVATION CENTER INC: $50,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL KEYSTONE AREA: $23,724 · Employment+1 more: $12,535 · EmploymentSEIU HEALTHCARE PA TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND: $252,800 · Membership BenefitAUBERLE: $124,043 · Human Services
Other$51,997,316Housing & Shelter$3,959,510Education$3,396,461Community Improvement$845,194Employment$607,455Membership Benefit$252,800Human Services$124,043

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA: $3,959,510 over 8y, 17% of budgetHARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: $2,328,043 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA: $1,404,381 over 8y, 22% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $739,426 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $310,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSEIU HEALTHCARE PA TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND: $252,800 over 2y, 13% of budgetTEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION: $239,964 over 1y, 10% of budgetPartnership for Career Development: $211,196 over 3y, 71% of budgetECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $186,550 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetHARRISBURG REGIONAL CHAMBER: $181,167 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetYORK COUNTY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE: $178,700 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTHE YORK COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR LEARNING: $161,849 over 8y, 28% of budgetHANOVER AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $145,197 over 2y, 17% of budgetAUBERLE: $124,043 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $106,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetEMPLOYMENT SKILLS CENTER: $81,083 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetCUMBERLAND AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $75,350 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetADAMS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $61,950 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetGREATER CHAMBERSBURG CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $57,060 over 3y, 40% of budgetWHITE ROSE COLLECTIVE: $53,513 over 1y, 26% of budgetCOVATION CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARRISBURG: $40,495 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA: $35,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRANKLIN COUNTY AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $31,900 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCapital Region Partnership for Career Development: $31,500 over 1y, 23% of budgetGOODWILL KEYSTONE AREA: $23,724 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE HOSPITALS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHCENTRAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD: $12,535 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMANTEC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES INC: $7,140 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKEYSTONE APPRENTICESHIP TRUST FUND: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA ↗
  • Who funds HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SEIU HEALTHCARE PA TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds TEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Partnership for Career Development ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HARRISBURG REGIONAL CHAMBER ↗
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE YORK COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds AUBERLE ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EMPLOYMENT SKILLS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CUMBERLAND AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ADAMS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHAMBERSBURG CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA23.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · York County Community Foundation · Philadelphia Works Inc · Bucks County Workforce Development Board Inc · Partnership for Better Health · I Car Education Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Firstenergy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southcentral Workforce Investment Board funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southcentral Workforce Investment Board. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southcentral Workforce Investment Board’s filings →

    More from the funding graph