How much did PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH grant in FY2025?

PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH reported 54 grants totaling $3,039,460 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH based?

PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH is based in PA.

PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH

The PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH champions and invests in ideas, initiatives, and collaborations that improve the health of the people and communities inour region.

$3.0M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$545k

Largest

01What you fund

0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Health$7.2MHuman Services$1.7MEducation$1.2MHousing & Shelter$873kFood & Nutrition$581kYouth Development$463kEnvironment$284kCrime & Legal$280kCommunity Improvement$242kOther$3.7M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

summer campcamp scholarshipsvolunteersstrongenhancingavailableinspire

2020

personal protectiveprotective equipmentmen's recoveryaccess affordablevarietysciencepolicies

2021

cleaningpurchase ppedisinfectingdecontaminationmeal suppliescontactstaff

2022

attend smmersmmer campcamp engagesupports healthyhealthy youthequityenvironment

2023

re-entryletortdairyaedsudden cardiaccardiac arrestreading

2024

weatherlatinoinnovative approachesactionoralbicycleavailable

2025

youth perrymental awarenesscardsadvance equityincrease accesscollaborationstable

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $16k
$10k–50k31 grants · $727k
$50k–250k20 grants · $1.4M
$250k+1 grant · $545k

$37,500

Median grant

States reached

$108M

Total assets

Largest grants

SADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION$545,000
NLC LIFEWORKS$165,000
CARLISLE CARES$135,000
TOMORROW'S NEIGHBORS$100,000
YWCA CARLISLE$97,280
SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES INC$90,000
CHURCH WORLD SERVICE HARRISBURG (PA)$75,000
PA COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COLLABORATIVE$69,250
LEAF PROJECT INC$65,000
THE HARBOR CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE INC$60,776
SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$60,000
HOPE STATION OPPORTUNITY AREA NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL$55,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN ESCAPE INC$53,784
THE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC$53,500
SUMMER PROGRAM FOR YOUTH$51,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$15M · 73 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

73 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$15M

$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%

+81%

Still filing today

81%

72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $440k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SH
SADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION
8× · 2018–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +140%
NS
NHS STEVENS CENTER
3× · 2018–2024 · $676k · revenue +9%
CC
COMMUNITY CARES
7× · 2019–2025 · $571k · revenue +262%

Funded once

M
MERAKEY
one grant, 2020 · $186k · revenue -1%
CP
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANKgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +52%
CK
CARLISLE KIWANIS CLUB FOUNDATION
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -15% · 30% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Counseling Center

To provide behavioral health services to individuals and families with mental health or substance abuse and related problems.

Health

South Central Emergency Medical

Provide emergency medical services.

—

Hospice of Central Pennsylvania

The mission of hospice of central pennsylvania is to provide the highest quality of emotional, physical, and spiritual support with compassion and respect.

Human Services

Penncares

Advance the quality of life and promote independence and productivity for individuals with disabilities and challenges throughout their lives.

Health

Family Health Council of Central Pa Inc

The mission of the family health council of central pennsylvania, inc. is to build and support community based health networks through partnerships, education, advocacy, and effective resource allocation.

Health

Partnership for Community Supports

Providing supports coordination for individuals with intellectual disabilities and service coordination for infants and toddlers who have a developmental delay or are at risk of a delay.

Health

Connections Work

Provides services, support and community reintegration to individuals in the justice system

—

Pennsylvania Women Work

Pa women work empowers women to prepare for and find lasting employment that pays a family-sustaining wage. the mission of the organization is to transform womens lives through empowerment, employment and economic independence.

Human Services

Pennsylvania Family Council

Foster social welfare by educating citizens.

—

Pennsylvania Health Care Association

Healthcare service programs

—

Children's Aid Society of Mercer County

Identify and provide services to improve the quality of life for children and families; providing adoption, daycare, and in-home family based mental health services. children's aid society is dedicated to support and strengthen children,…

—

Health Promotion Council of

To promote health, and prevent and manage chronic diseases.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diakon Child Family & Community and the most unlike its peers is Young Men's Christian Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/131

the rest of the field

264/4,123

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

101/103

Grantees still filing

84/103

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$7,224,729Other$4,461,954Human Services$1,740,923Education$1,227,067Housing & Shelter$872,960Food & Nutrition$581,199Youth Development$462,806

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA60.2× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · United Way of the Capital Region · United Way of Carlisle & Cumberland · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Community Aid Inc · Ppl Foundation · Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Members 1st Charitable Foundation · The United Way of the Shippensburg · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Carl L and Glenda T Cramer

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CUMBERLAND VALLEY RAILS-TO-TRAILS COUNCIL INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~21 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 232630981 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CUMBERLAND VALLEY RAILS-TO-TRAILS COUNCIL INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 21 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 92% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Partnership for Better Health?

Find your warmest path to Partnership for Better Health through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Partnership for Better Health?

More from the funding graph

PARTNERSHIP FOR BETTER HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Partnership for Better Health?

More from the funding graph