Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

South Carolina Physicians Care Charity Inc

The sc physicians care charity provides grants to other non-profit organizations with missions that promote health and wellness through their various projects within the borders of south carolina.

$599k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$742kEducation$382kHousing & Shelter$265kPhilanthropy$208kFood & Nutrition$154kCrime & Legal$83kYouth Development$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kOther$561k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $386k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Central Carolina Community$100,000
Florence Crittenton Programs$100,000
Free Medical Clinic- Columbia$76,000
Healthy Learners$60,000
Orangeburg County Council$50,000
Screaming Eagles$35,000
Palmetto Community Health$30,000
SC Free Clinic Association$30,000
Orangeburg- Calhoun Technical$29,767
The Ark of SC$28,099
Community Initiatives$25,000
Childrens Advocacy Center$18,479
Bluffton Jasper Volunteers$11,511
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $566k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Memory Matters: $75k → 10%Children In Crisis of Dorches: $55k → 11%MISSION LEXINGTON: $51k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CLINIC - CHESTER: $16k → 18%COMMUNITY INITIATIVES GREENWOOD: $40k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 21%Orangeburg County Council: $50k → 25%VITAL AGING OF WILLIAMSBURG CO: $15k → 26%GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRIES: $37k → 18%Greater Greenwood United Mini: $30k → 18%Healthy Learners: $60k → 16%Community Initiatives: $25k → 18%Connie Maxwell Childrens Min: $25k → 18%COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $12k → 18%CONNIE MAXWELL CHILDREN'S HOME: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 22 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
39

Total granted

$1.8M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+14%

Still filing today

95%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $321k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLUFFTON-JASPER COUNTY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $142k · revenue +109%
  • University of South Carolina Educational Foundation
    3× · 2019–2023 · $130k · revenue +100%
  • HL
    HEALTHY LEARNERS
    2× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • MS
    MARY SUNSHINE HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $265k · revenue -27% · 58% of their budget
  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA ADVOCATES FOR AGRICULTURE
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -72%
  • MM
    MEMORY MATTERS
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Smith Medical Clinic Inc

To provide free healthcare services to low-income, uninsured adults in georgetown county, sc. the clinic envisions a healthier community where healthcare services are available to all regardless of their financial capability.

2
Samaritan Health Clinic of Pickens County

To provide free medical care and discount prescriptions to those in need in pickens county

3
Clemson Free Clinic

To deliver high-quality medical care and essential pharmaceuticals with unwavering compassion and respect. we focus our efforts on individuals aged 12 to 64 who find themselves without the safety net of medicaid, medicare, or any other…

Health
4
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

5
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
6
Virginia B Andes Volunteer Community Clinic Inc

Provide no-cost volunteer medical, pharmacy and wellness services to the under-served in charlotte county

Health
7
Good Shepherd Free Medical Clinic of Laurens County

Provide free medical care, medications, & pastoral counsel to laurens county, sc residents without government help or private insurance who are unable to afford care.

Health
8
Macon Volunteer Clinic Inc

Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.

Health
9
Health Care Partners of South Carolina Inc

The organization provides health care to individuals regardless of their ability to pay. this is a direct fulfillment of their tax exempt purpose.

Health
10
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

11
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
12
Beaufort-Jasper-Hampton Comprehensive Health Services Inc

Provide community healthcare services to the citizens in the low country of south carolina.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Advocacy Center of Spartanburg Cherokee - Union Inc and the most unlike its peers is Columbia International University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCharter and Preparatory Sch…Community Primary Care Netw…Faith-Based Senior LivingChildren's Disability Servi…Youth & Community Sports Pr…University Support Foundati…Youth Sports & Arts Boosters
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr13%38%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr18%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%13%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr13%31%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr18%22%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/70
the rest of the field
15%
1,769/12,055

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/67
Grantees still filing
38/67
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $181,750 · HealthFREE MEDICAL CLINIC INCWELVISTA — $160,680 · HealthWELVISTABLUFFTON-JASPER COUNTY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $141,619 · HealthBLUFFTON-JASPER COUNTY VOLUNTEERS IN …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCGOOD NEIGHBOR FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF BEAUFORT — $81,110 · HealthGOOD NEIGHBOR FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF …BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $64,095 · HealthMERCY MEDICAL FREE CLINICS — $52,498 · HealthLOW COUNTRY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC — $52,013 · HealthLEEZA GIBBONS MEMORY FOUNDATION INC dba LEEZAS CARE CONNECTION — $46,500 · HealthFREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF AIKEN COUNTY INC COMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF AIKEN COUNTY — $44,705 · Health+13 more — $325,442 · Health+13 moreHEALTHY LEARNERS — $120,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHY LEARNERSCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC — $76,899 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES …MEMORY MATTERS — $75,000 · Human ServicesMEMORY MATTERSGREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY — $67,080 · Human ServicesGREATER GREENWOOD UNIT…KAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $54,500 · Human ServicesKAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADV…MISSION LEXINGTON — $50,875 · Human ServicesMISSION LEXINGTONORANGEBURG COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $50,000 · Human ServicesORANGEBURG COUNTY COUN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red …SOUTH CAROLINA RESPITE COALITION — $50,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH CAROLINA RESPITE…Connie Maxwell Children's Ministries — $49,965 · Human ServicesConnie Maxwell Childre…Law Enforcement Chaplaincy for South Carolina — $43,129 · Human ServicesLaw Enforcement Chapla…+3 more — $54,298 · Human Services+3 moreALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - GREENVILLE COUNTY — $175,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIO…Florence Crittenton Programs — $100,000 · OtherFlorence Crittenton Pr…ALS ASSOCIATION SC CHAPTERINC — $60,000 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION SC CHA…SOUTH CAROLINA STATE FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION — $59,180 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA STATE F…PALMETTO PLACE CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES — $50,000 · OtherPALMETTO PLACE CHILDRE…POWER IN CHANGING — $32,600 · OtherSEA HAVEN INC — $44,422 · OtherSEA HAVEN INCSCREAMING EAGLES SPECIAL NEEDS ATHLETICS — $35,000 · OtherICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC — $30,000 · Other+11 more — $168,126 · Other+11 moreUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $130,000 · EducationUniversity …COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA IN…THE CARE HOUSE OF THE PEE DEE INC — $65,000 · EducationTHE CARE HO…Columbia College — $35,000 · EducationColumbia Co…ORANGEBURG-CALHOUN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $29,767 · EducationORANGEBURG-…YORK TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · EducationYORK TECHNI…The Charleston Promise Neighborhood — $22,000 · EducationThe Charles…MARY SUNSHINE HOUSE — $265,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $150,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MORNING — $55,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropySOUTH CAROLINA ADVOCATES FOR AGRICULTURE — $75,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $50,000 · Food & NutritionRobinHood Group — $28,500 · Food & Nutrition
Health$1,250,412Human Services$741,746Other$754,328Education$381,767Housing & Shelter$265,000Philanthropy$207,500Food & Nutrition$153,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARY SUNSHINE HOUSE — $265,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetFREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $181,750 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetWELVISTA — $160,680 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLUFFTON-JASPER COUNTY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $141,619 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $130,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY LEARNERS — $120,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF BEAUFORT — $81,110 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC — $76,899 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA ADVOCATES FOR AGRICULTURE — $75,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMEMORY MATTERS — $75,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY — $67,080 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTHE CARE HOUSE OF THE PEE DEE INC — $65,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $64,095 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA STATE FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION — $59,180 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNEW MORNING — $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $54,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMERCY MEDICAL FREE CLINICS — $52,498 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLOW COUNTRY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC — $52,013 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION LEXINGTON — $50,875 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetORANGEBURG COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $50,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetPALMETTO PLACE CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES — $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA RESPITE COALITION — $50,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetConnie Maxwell Children's Ministries — $49,965 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEEZA GIBBONS MEMORY FOUNDATION INC dba LEEZAS CARE CONNECTION — $46,500 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetFREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF AIKEN COUNTY INC COMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF AIKEN COUNTY — $44,705 over 1y, 11% of budgetColumbia College — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $34,335 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetST LUKES FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF SPARTANBURG INC — $34,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVISION TO LEARN — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA FREE CLINIC ASSOC — $30,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetORANGEBURG-CALHOUN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $29,767 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetRobinHood Group — $28,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetThe ARK of SC — $28,099 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetFREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF NEWBERRY COUNTY INC — $28,003 over 1y, 15% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA NURSES FOUNDATI — $25,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetFREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF DARLINGTON COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetYORK TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of York County — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME — $23,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Charleston Promise Neighborhood — $22,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOPEFUL HORIZONS — $21,327 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF AIKEN COUNTY — $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC70× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · The Leon Levine Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · United Way of the Midlands · Davis Family Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Duke Endowment · Foundation for the Carolinas

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization South Carolina Physicians Care Charity Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to South Carolina Physicians Care Charity Inc?

    Find your warmest path to South Carolina Physicians Care Charity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph