· Public charity
United Way of the Midlands
United way connects people and resources to improve the quality of life in the midlands.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 36 grants below total $4,680,951 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,267,866 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,586,915 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $300k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+6 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE MIDLANDS | $1,278,192 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $499,485 |
| MIRCI | $360,000 |
| MIDLANDS FATHERHOOD COALITION | $360,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MIDLANDS | $292,202 |
| FAIRFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT | $250,000 |
| MIDLANDS HOUSING ALLIANCE (TRANSITIONS) | $160,000 |
| VITAL CONNECTIONS OF THEMIDLANDS | $158,830 |
| UNITED WAY ASSOCIATION OF SC | $147,265 |
| HOMELESS NO MORE | $114,750 |
| HOMEWORKS OF AMERICA | $113,958 |
| BROOKLAND CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC CHANGE | $111,000 |
| FREE MEDICAL CLINIC | $100,000 |
| CITY YEAR COLUMBIA | $85,000 |
| SENIOR RESOURCES | $70,720 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMidlands Housing Alliance Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +97%
- MIMental Illness Recovery Center Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +35%
- VCVital Connections of the Midlands9× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +28%
Funded once
- COCHURCH OF THE BRETHRENone grant, 2017 · $184k
- UBUNITED BLACK CLERGY INCone grant, 2017 · $125k
- GIGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF UPSTATEMIDLANDS SOUTH CAROLINA INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $95k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse
We strive to serve the community by constructing and rehabilitating homes for affordable homeownership, providing new housing rentals for low to moderate wealth families in south carolina, and providing services that aid in all aspects of…
Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.
South carolina legal services is a statewide law firm that provides civil legal services to protect the rights and represent the interests of low income south carolinians.
Origin sc empowers individuals to achieve financial, housing and mental health stability through advocacy, counseling, and education.
Our vision is that every south carolina child will be prepared for success in school.
Our mission is that every south carolina child will arrive at kindergarten ready to succeed.
The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families
Our mission is that every south carolina child will arrive at kindergarten ready to succeed.
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
Per south carolina code of laws section 59-152-10: there is established the south carolina first steps to school readiness, a comprehensive, results- oriented initiative for improving early childhood development by providing, through local…
Communityworks is a publicly supported organization and certified community development financial institution that provides funding to promote affordable housing and community development to help stabilize low wealth families and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas and the most unlike its peers is The Brookland Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE MIDLANDS INC ↗
- Who funds Midlands Housing Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds Mental Illness Recovery Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Vital Connections of the Midlands ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of the Crescent Region ↗
- Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PALMETTO PLACE CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Richland County Public Library ↗
- Who funds Fairfield County School District Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOME WORKS OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Midlands Fatherhood Coalition ↗
- Who funds Senior Resources Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSION LEXINGTON ↗
- Who funds Boys Farm Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA - MOUNTAINS TO MIDLANDS INC ↗
- Who funds The Cooperative Ministry ↗
- Who funds ALSTON WILKES SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SISTERCARE INC ↗
- Who funds NEWBERRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds BROOKLAND CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC CHANGE ↗
- Who funds FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF NEWBERRY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Newberry County Literacy Council ↗
- Who funds WINGS FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds Prisma Health-Midlands ↗
- Who funds ORANGEBURG CALHOUN FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds ABLE SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds One-Eighty Place ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Lipscomb Family Foundation · United Way Association of South Carolina Inc · Prisma Health · Junior League of Columbia Inc · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Nord Family Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · South Carolina Physicians Care Charity Inc · Michael J Mungo Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of the Midlands funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.