Skip to content

· Public charity

Sonoma County Economic Development Board Foundation

To support sonoma county's economic development board programs

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$999kArts & Culture$321kCommunity Improvement$207kPublic Benefit$55kYouth Development$19kCrime & Legal$8kHuman Services$7k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$720k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%California Parenting Institut: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
2
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
3
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
4
Sonoma Community Center

SCC exists to enrich the lives of the people of Sonoma Valley by fostering a broad range of cultural, educational, recreational and community service activities in an affordable space as well as helping to preserve and restore our historic…

Human Services
5
Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy
6
Sonoma Country Day School

The sonoma country day school mission is to bring learning to life through the guiding principles of engagement, relationship, integrity, creativity and contribution.

Education
7
Sonoma Valley Film Festival

Sonoma valley film society produces the annual international film festival

Arts & Culture
8
Bridge California

Education

Education
9
Children's Museum of Sonoma County

To inspire curiosity and creativity in children through joyful, transformative experiences.

Arts & Culture
10
Sonoma Valley Teen Services

Teen services sonoma engages and supports teens with work-readiness skills and experiences, and job placement and career coaching services that empower them to succeed.

—
11
Boys & Girls Club of Manteca

The mission of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Manteca and Lathrop is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. Our Club provides a safe,…

Youth Development
12
Northern California Center for the Arts

The Center for the Arts is a cultural and educational organization that promotes and presents the literary, visual and performing arts for the enrichment of the community.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latino Service Providers; the most unlike its peers is California Poets in the Schools. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $999,205 · EducationSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSonoma County Regional Parks: $243,950 · OtherSonoma County Regional …Individual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+11 more: $80,250 · Other+11 moreEconomic Development and Financing Corporation Inc: $200,000 · Arts & CultureEconomic Develo…ARTESCAPE: $11,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $6,500 · Arts & CultureSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $39,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA VALLEY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA VALLEY: $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentDemeo Teen Club Inc: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentCalifornia Parenting Institute: $6,500 · Human Services
Education$999,205Other$339,200Arts & Culture$218,000Philanthropy$39,000Youth Development$12,500Human Services$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $999,205 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetEconomic Development and Financing Corporation Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $39,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia Poets in the Schools: $7,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetIMAGINE BUS PROJECT: $7,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA-MARIN: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO SERVICE PROVIDERS: $6,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA VALLEY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA VALLEY: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Parenting Institute: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDemeo Teen Club Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA34.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · United Way of the Wine Country · Marin Community Foundation · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · Bothin Foundation · McNabb Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Trione Foundation · Resnick Foundation · Speedway Children's Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sonoma County Economic Development Board Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sonoma County Economic Development Board Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sonoma County Economic Development Board Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sonoma County Economic Development Board Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sonoma County Economic Development Board’s filings →

    More from the funding graph