· Private foundation
Solomon Mendel & Sylvia Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $222k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| OUTREACH TEEN & FAMILY SERVICES | $25,000 |
| ALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR | $25,000 |
| WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $17,084 |
| THE BLESSING BOARD | $15,000 |
| HEALING HUNGER BEAVER COUNTY | $15,000 |
| WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PITTSBURGH | $15,000 |
| YOUNG ADULT SURVIVORS UNITED | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| CRAWFORD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS | $14,500 |
| HANDMADE ARCADE | $10,000 |
| NEW SUN RISING | $10,000 |
| FOOD MOXIE | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF BUTLER COUNTY | $9,500 |
| COMMON THREADS | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $217k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RRIVERLIFE2× · 2021–2023 · $50k · revenue +220%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue +61%
- CICARNEGIE INSTITUTE2× · 2017–2023 · $33k · revenue +57%
Funded once
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +26%- KKIDSVOICEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +50%
- UWUNITED WAY OF SW PENNSYLVANIAone grant, 2022 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Vibrant pittsburgh's mission is to accelerate the business community toward equitable, inclusive, and diverse workplaces, creating a future-forward region.
Catapult engages in connecting families to emergency resources, peer to peer support, wealth building, trauma informed financial counseling & policy advocacy to ensure that communities can meaningfully achieve economic justice & lead…
Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…
Provide information to decision maker in the pittsburgh region to promote economic prosperity, social equity, and environmental quality for sustainable solutions for communities and businesses.
Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.
To provide residential and community-based services and advocacy for women, children, and families, providing job training and employment assistance, as well as outreach and residential programs in order to help its clients achieve…
The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…
Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the
Educate and advocate on behalf of the construction, energy, and manufacturing industries and the resulting economic and job growth in pennsylvania.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hosanna House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Somerset County Mobile Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds RIVERLIFE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds KIDSVOICE ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Kitchen of Grace Inc ↗
- Who funds Propel Charter School-McKeesport ↗
- Who funds MAYA ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds IMANI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds OPERATION TROOP APPRECIATION ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION ↗
- Who funds Outreach Teen and Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds HELLO NEIGHBOR ↗
- Who funds NATRONA COMES TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds SOMERSET COUNTY MOBILE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds VINTAGE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN SERVICES CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA TROLLEY MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ROSEDALE TECHNICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds RIVERVIEW CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds BIKE PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds DOORS OPEN PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds SEWICKLEY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW CENTURY CAREERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Heinz Endowments · The Buhl Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Solomon Mendel & Sylvia Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.