· Public charity
Social Justice Partners Los Angeles
We support the creation of systems of care for the wellbeing and liberation for those working towards more justice in los angeles.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $44,375 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $504,375 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $460,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $10,625 |
| ARCHITECTURE ADVOCACY | $5,625 |
| THE LOS ANGELES UNITED METHODIST URBAN | $5,625 |
| FIDEICOMISO COMUNITARIO TIERRA LIBRE | $5,625 |
| NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK | $5,625 |
| LA FORWARD INSTITUTE | $5,625 |
| INTEGRATIVE COMMUNITIES INC | $5,625 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ASA STEP TO FREEDOM3× · 2021–2023 · $227k · revenue +132%
- NVNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES3× · 2021–2023 · $220k · revenue +311%
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERS7× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +266%
Funded once
- JIJOVENES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $66k · revenue +44%
- NONetwork on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Childrenone grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue -21%
- CRCritical Resistancegraduatedone grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +136%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mentorship and housing assistant for women returning from incarceration
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
Provider of human services
The mission of fair opportunity for change, inc. is to provide quality interim supportive housing services to homeless single adults and families with children.
Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Provide housing and services to the most vulnerable population, especially those transitioning from (or at risk of) homelessness or institutionalization, through a variety of innovative supportive housing models.
The mission of Mental Health Advocacy Services (MHAS) is to protect and advance the legal rights of low-income adults and children with mental health disabilities and empower them to assert those rights in order to maximize their autonomy,…
The fair housing foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to the elimination of discrimination in housing and promoting equal access to housing choices for everyone.
The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Works and the most unlike its peers is New Direction Community Programs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds A STEP TO FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS TEMPORARY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD ↗
- Who funds TIMELIST GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING WORKS ↗
- Who funds ASCENCIA ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT ALCOHOL AND DRUG EDUCATION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE TO HOME SCV ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds INITIATE JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds TESTIMONIAL COMMUNITY LOVE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Men Taking Over Reforming Society Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Sanctuary of Hope ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds CANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds JOVENES INC ↗
- Who funds Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children ↗
- Who funds Critical Resistance ↗
- Who funds BROOM HOMESTEAD INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Los Angeles Room & Board ↗
- Who funds LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TRUE COLORS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds END HOMELESSNESS CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MY FRIENDS HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VENICE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HOLLIDAYS HELPING HANDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fathers and Mothers Who Care ↗
- Who funds A MEANINGFUL GOAL HOUSING SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds M F PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LIVING AND LEARNING ↗
- Who funds LA VOICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Inc · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Annenberg Foundation · The California Endowment · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Christ-Centered Ministries · Conrad N Hilton Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Social Justice Partners Los Angeles funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Social Justice Partners Los Angeles?
Find your warmest path to Social Justice Partners Los Angeles through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.