Skip to content
Skelton Myra F Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Skelton Myra F Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$524kHealth$116kRecreation & Sports$65kHuman Services$61kHousing & Shelter$52kReligion$37kYouth Development$24kFood & Nutrition$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$63,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$63,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MOTHER SETON HOUSE INC: $8k → 13%COURT-APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE: $7k → 11%JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%NATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 11%JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE: $10k → 11%CASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $6k → 11%CASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $5k → 11%WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE: $5k → 11%CASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$811k · 17 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$811k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+4%

Still filing today

71%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $246k · revenue +116%
  • WR
    Wyoming Rescue Mission
    4× · 2018–2023 · $28k · revenue +27%
  • SO
    Special Olympics Wyoming Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • MM
    MIDWEST-EDGERTON MEDICAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • CC
    CASPER COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -32%
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF WYOMING
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caring Foundation of Wyoming
Human Services
2
Wyoming Cares Inc

None

Human Services
3
Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii
Health
4
Cares Inc

To serve victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and other crimes committted in big horn county, wyoming

Human Services
5
Wyoming County Special Needs Association
Human Services
6
Wyoming Citizen Review Panel

WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…

Human Services
7
Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals
8
Western Wyoming Family Planning Inc

We provide family planning service to those individuals who ned and request such services. we serve a six county area in western wyoming.

Health
9
Wyoming Community Hospital Foundation

To raise funds on behalf of the wyoming county community hospital.

—
10
Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network

The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.

Philanthropy
11
Carbon County Counseling Center

To provide professional counseling services related primarily to mental health and substance abuse to the residents of Carbon County, Wyoming.

—
12
Wyoming Food Coalition Wy Food Matters
Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make a Wish Foundation of Wyoming; the most unlike its peers is The Science Zone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $273,178 · EducationCASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $246,086 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATIONCHURCH OF THE HOLY FAMILY: $36,959 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HOLY FAM…Special Olympics Wyoming Inc: $26,000 · OtherSpecial Olympics Wyomi…CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS: $19,500 · OtherCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPIC…CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF: $17,325 · OtherCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENT…GREATER WYOMING BIG BROTHERS: $16,000 · OtherGREATER WYOMING BIG BR…NATIONAL FOUNDATION OF DENTISTRY: $15,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF…MIDWEST-EDGERTON MEDICAL SERVICES: $12,000 · OtherMIDWEST-EDGERTON MEDIC…CASPER YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $8,000 · OtherOUR CAMP INC: $6,000 · OtherMIMIS HOUSE: $6,000 · Other+4 more: $15,100 · Other+4 moreWyoming Rescue Mission: $27,500 · Housing & ShelterYOUTH CRISIS CENTER: $15,500 · Housing & ShelterWyoming Dementia Care: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterCASPER HOUSING AUTHORITY CARES: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterMOTHER SETON HOUSING INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $16,000 · Human ServicesWYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · Human ServicesMOTHER SETON HOUSE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesCASA of Natrona County: $7,000 · Human ServicesNATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC: $21,000 · HealthMERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $17,500 · HealthMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF WYOMING: $8,000 · HealthCamp Hope Inc: $33,000 · Recreation & SportsCASPER COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE PROJECT: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SCIENCE ZONE: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$519,264Other$177,884Housing & Shelter$60,500Human Services$60,500Health$46,500Recreation & Sports$33,000Environment$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $273,178 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $246,086 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Hope Inc: $33,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetWyoming Rescue Mission: $27,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSpecial Olympics Wyoming Inc: $26,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS: $19,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $16,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetYOUTH CRISIS CENTER: $15,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCASPER COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF WYOMING: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMOTHER SETON HOUSE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWyoming Dementia Care: $7,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCASA of Natrona County: $7,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMIMIS HOUSE: $6,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNatrona County Public Library Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCASPER HOUSING AUTHORITY CARES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMOTHER SETON HOUSING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SCIENCE ZONE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBill of Rights Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community Fou…The McMurry FoundationNatrona Collective He…Zimmerman Family Foun…First Interstate Banc…Wold FoundationCentral Wyoming Chapt…United Way of Natrona…Double 4 FoundationThe Goodstein Foundat…Blue Envelope Health …Wheeler Family Founda…
Wyoming Community FoundationWY44.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · Zimmerman Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Wold Foundation · Central Wyoming Chapter of the American Petroleum Institute · United Way of Natrona County · Double 4 Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation · Blue Envelope Health Fund · Wheeler Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Skelton Myra F Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Skelton Myra F Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Skelton Myra F’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home