Skip to content
Singiser Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Singiser Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$179kHuman Services$72kAnimals$66kFood & Nutrition$57kHousing & Shelter$43kPhilanthropy$15kEducation$3kInternational$263Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BABY FOUNDATION$10,737
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,250
HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE$5,000
HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY$5,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WI$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC$5,000
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$5,000
UNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY$5,000
GREELEY WELD HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
HUNGER TASK FORCE$5,000
ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATIONKIDSPAK$5,000
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION COLORADO CHAPTER$5,000
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$5,000
LARIMER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $5k → 10%KIDS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $263 → 15%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $6k → 8%BABY FOUNDATION: $11k → 9%BABY FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%BABY FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $5k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $5k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $5k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $3k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
CO
KS
TN
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$368k · 21 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$368k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+39%

Still filing today

57%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    4× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +384%
  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +87%
  • HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • TR
    The Roberti Community House
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue -38%
  • TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +128%
  • 4P
    4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
2
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
3
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
4
Habitat for Humanity Inc

Habitat seeks to eliminate poverty housing from the world and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of La Plata County Inc

To build decent, affordable homes in partnership with families in need.

—
6
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater cincinnati offers a community of compassion, support and the comforts of home to families with critically ill children, steps away from the medical care they need.

Human Services
7
Chaffee County Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
8
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
9
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
10
Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope. hfhc builds the capacity of habitat for humanity affiliates in colorado by increasing access to resources,…

—
11
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
12
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation Boulder County; the most unlike its peers is The Roberti Community House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FISHER CENTER ALZHEIMER RESEARCH: $52,500 · OtherFISHER CENTER ALZHEIMER RESEARCHST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $35,250 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITALROTARY CLUB FOUNDATIONKIDSPAK: $32,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB FOUNDATIONKIDSPAKRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WI: $14,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WIHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $14,000 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCCHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATION: $13,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $10,000 · OtherALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherLARIMER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $8,000 · Other+9 more: $37,502 · Other+9 moreTHE BABY FOUNDATION MCKEE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $22,051 · Human ServicesTHE BABY FOUND…HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $20,250 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF NEIGH…The Roberti Community House: $5,500 · Human ServicesThe Roberti Co…4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $5,000 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABI…MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEEL…+1 more: $263 · Human ServicesK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $24,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRI…HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $24,000 · AnimalsHUMANE ANIMAL…Noco Humane: $4,750 · AnimalsNoco HumaneTHE JED FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthTHE JED FOU…Ronald McDonald House Global: $10,000 · HealthRonald McDo…CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S …ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…GREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterGREELEY A…CITA Thrifts Inc: $4,750 · Housing & ShelterCITA Thri…ALACHUA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterALACHUA H…UNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY: $10,025 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Public Benefit
Other$226,752Human Services$58,064Animals$52,750Health$44,000Housing & Shelter$37,250Philanthropy$15,025Public Benefit$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $24,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BABY FOUNDATION MCKEE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $22,051 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetHOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $20,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY: $10,025 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Roberti Community House: $5,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNoco Humane: $4,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITA Thrifts Inc: $4,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALACHUA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $263 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Community Foundation …Anschutz Family Found…Otter Cares Foundatio…The Blackbaud Giving …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Anschutz Family Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Singiser Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Singiser Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Singiser Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home