· Private foundation
Siebert Williams Shank Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $170k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $539k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC | $100,000 |
| NAN NEWARK TECH WORLD | $75,000 |
| HARLEM SCHOOL OF THE ARTS | $50,000 |
| URBAN INITIATIVES INC | $50,000 |
| CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES | $30,000 |
| TUXEDO PARK SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| MASTERS TOURNAMENT FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHCIGAN | $25,000 |
| HARLEM WEEK INC | $25,000 |
| RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA | $25,000 |
| THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY | $24,000 |
| MENTAL HEALTH COALITION INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
48 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $522k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NNNAN NEWARK TECH WORLD4× · 2021–2024 · $250k · revenue +47%
THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY3× · 2021–2024 · $149k · revenue +11%
UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +82%
Funded once
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +583%- UWUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INCone grant, 2021 · $27k · revenue -17%
- MWMORGAN'S WONDERLAND INCLUSIONone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Links Foundation Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Amsterdam News Educational Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NAN NEWARK TECH WORLD ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA COUNCIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARLEM SCHOOL OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds NFX ↗
- Who funds HARLEM WEEK INC ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHARTON GRADUATE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE DRUMTHWACKET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Tuxedo Park School ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MASTERS TOURNAMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds West Palm Beach Police Fund Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Dte Energy Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Altman Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Siebert Williams Shank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Broward County Inc — 27% of income from government
- Nan Newark Tech World — 19% of income from government
- Children's Aid and Family Services Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.