How much did SHP CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of SHP CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

operation

2019

silicon valley

2020

valleyoperation

2021

health

2022

christhealthbay

2023

international

2024

baptist churchame zionzion churchmenlohealth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k10 grants · $28k
$10k–50k10 grants · $176k
$50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
$250k+5 grants · $2.8M

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$64M

Total assets

Largest grants

DIGNITYMOVES$1,000,000
CRAZY LOVE MINISTRIES$873,000
RIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$305,000
PROJECT WEHOPE$300,000
HEALING GROVE HEALTH CENTER$300,000
CROSS ROADS PUBLICATIONS$210,000
CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION$151,073
TDCMA$150,000
WORLDWIDE BIBLE SOCIETY$122,400
U CHANNEL FOUNDATION$111,000
GLAD TIDINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$100,000
POP'S FOUNDATIONS$100,000
WORLD VISION US$60,000
NEW SWEET HOME CHURCH$50,000
MENLO CHURCH$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$18M · 55 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

55 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$18M

$9.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+40%

Still filing today

42%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GT
GLAD TIDINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
4× · 2021–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +753%
CL
CRAZY LOVE MINISTRIES
7× · 2018–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +411%
CH
CITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO
5× · 2018–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +99%

Funded once

SJ
SAN JOSE EMERGENCY HOUSING LOT E
one grant, 2023 · $4.6M
AS
ABODE SERVICE
one grant, 2017 · $2.0M
CO
CITY OF SAN JOSE
one grant, 2020 · $1.5M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion

China Soul for Christ Foundation

Religion

Nora Lam Chinese Ministries Int'l

Promote the good news and teaching of Jesus Christ in China and throughout the world; Provide aid as relief and development assistance to the poor and needy worldwide.

Religion

Go Live Serve International Inc

Go Live Serve International mobilizes and sends professionals and students to serve short-term and long-term in Asian developing countries as witnesses of God's love in obedience to the Great Commandment (love God and one's neighbors) and…

Religion

Love China Ministries International

The mission of Love China Ministries International (LCMI) is to build up the Body of Christ (His Church) throughout the world by all legal available means. Love China's major priority was to the House Church Movement in the People's…

Religion

Jesus in Vietnam Ministries

Religion

Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

Christian mission organization

Religion

Gospel Operation International for

Our mission is to accomplish the Great Commission through the use of resources of Chinese churches worldwide in mission education, recruitment, training, missionary sending, and all other effective means in collaboration with the Global…

Religion

China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

—

Asia Harvest Inc

To help spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ by providing resources and financial support to projects throughout Asia

International

Bless Asia Network

To fulfil the great commission of christ

Religion

Modern Day Missions

Modern Day Missions provides services that enable missionaries to raise financial support so they can fulfill the calling of taking Jesus Christ to the nations.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Love Foundation Us Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hers Breast Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/64

the rest of the field

12%

9,816/81,893

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

51/54

Grantees still filing

38/54

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$17,599,412Religion$4,812,112Housing & Shelter$3,445,844Human Services$1,606,500Arts & Culture$554,000Health$481,300International$412,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA22.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Asian Pacific Fund · Bright Funds Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Nissi Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The William G Irwin Charity Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SHP CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WORLDWIDE BIBLE SOCIETY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~23 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 912101762 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WORLDWIDE BIBLE SOCIETY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 23 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 61% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Shp Christian Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Shp Christian Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SHP CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Shp Christian Foundation?

More from the funding graph

SHP CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Shp Christian Foundation?

More from the funding graph