· Private foundation
Shp Christian Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $176k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+5 grants · $2.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIGNITYMOVES | $1,000,000 |
| CRAZY LOVE MINISTRIES | $873,000 |
| RIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $305,000 |
| HEALING GROVE HEALTH CENTER | $300,000 |
| PROJECT WEHOPE | $300,000 |
| CROSS ROADS PUBLICATIONS | $210,000 |
| CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION | $151,073 |
| TDCMA | $150,000 |
| WORLDWIDE BIBLE SOCIETY | $122,400 |
| U CHANNEL FOUNDATION | $111,000 |
| GLAD TIDINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP | $100,000 |
| POP'S FOUNDATIONS | $100,000 |
| WORLD VISION US | $60,000 |
| SHILOH UNITED SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| MENLO CHURCH | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $950k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GTGLAD TIDINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT4× · 2021–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +216%
- CLCRAZY LOVE MINISTRIES7× · 2018–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +320%
- CHCITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO5× · 2018–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +120%
Funded once
- SJSAN JOSE EMERGENCY HOUSING LOT Eone grant, 2023 · $4.6M
- ASABODE SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2.0M · revenue +240%
- COCITY OF SAN JOSEone grant, 2020 · $1.5M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious
The mission of Love China Ministries International (LCMI) is to build up the Body of Christ (His Church) throughout the world by all legal available means. Love China's major priority was to the House Church Movement in the People's…
Go Live Serve International mobilizes and sends professionals and students to serve short-term and long-term in Asian developing countries as witnesses of God's love in obedience to the Great Commandment (love God and one's neighbors) and…
The Vietnamese Scocial Minisrty Supports the needy and ease their burden By provide practical assistance > It services through targered toward Vietnamese immigranta in need in Santa Clara County
Urban Angels SF (Urban Angels) is a not-for-profit organization with the mission to sustain the homeless of San Francisco while they are in transition from living on the streets to safe permanent housing. Our volunteers provide sustenance…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
To assist small Chinese churches in growth, breakthrough, and support ministers financially; to advance God's kingdom ministry via multimedia.
Assist missionaries form asian churches to integrate effectively into the target culture together with teir field partners and help them to undertake god-honoring initiatives which help the neediest people
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live in Peace and the most unlike its peers is Mh Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLAD TIDINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds CRAZY LOVE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ABODE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds DIGNITYMOVES ↗
- Who funds WORLDWIDE BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WEHOPE ↗
- Who funds POPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION DAWN ↗
- Who funds LOVE FOUNDATION US INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER OF LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MISSION ASSET FUND ↗
- Who funds BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE MEDIA EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION USA ↗
- Who funds U Channel Foundation ↗
- Who funds SHILOH UNITED SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SHOWERS OF BLESSING EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY USA ↗
- Who funds DOUBLE PORTION MEDIA ↗
- Who funds Streetlife Ministries ↗
- Who funds Joyful Noise Xpress Inc ↗
- Who funds VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) ↗
- Who funds LIVE IN PEACE ↗
- Who funds APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Nissi Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shp Christian Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Asian Health & Service Center Inc — 18% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Shp Christian Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Shp Christian Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.