Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Missouri · Nonprofit

BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL

BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL (Missouri) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $385,384 to it, the largest being SHP FOUNDATION ($200,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$112k
Revenue FY2024
5
Funders on record
$385k
Grants received
$63k
Net assets
3/5 repeat funders

Against its field

BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−24% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,796 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $10k → $136k.

Funder
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
Perception Fundingunclassified
$118k
funders
1
2
1
3
3
2

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL.

52%
largest funder
92%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 83% · 2021 100% · 2022 75% · 2023 74%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL draws 66% of its grant income from funders outside Missouri, across 2 states in all.

CA
MO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
23
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $42k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL?
BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL (Missouri) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $385,384 to it, the largest being SHP FOUNDATION ($200,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $385,384 in grants to BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL?
SHP FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $200,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BRIDGING NATIONS INTERNATIONAL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing