Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shirar Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$166kInternational$133kHuman Services$48kAnimals$30kHealth$25kEnvironment$10kEducation$8kPublic Benefit$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$689k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERMILION UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$15,000
OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$15,000
RETRIEVING FREEDOM$15,000
MAKE-A-WISH CENTRAL & WESTERN NC$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
DIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA$5,000
YMCA ANNUAL CAMPAIGN$1,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST #839$500
Individual grant recipient$250
GLOBAL VENTURES MINISTRY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
IA
CA
KY
VA
AR
NC
SC
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Shirar Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Shirar Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$341k · 13 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

$341k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+42%

Still filing today

31%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthAnimalsEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $63k · revenue +83%
  • RF
    RETRIEVING FREEDOM INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +26%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • OD
    OPEN DOORS USA
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • IN
    IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Insight for Living

Insight for living is a christian radio ministry that teaches the practical application of the bible. insight for living reaches audiences through radio sermons, compact disc recordings, dvd's, podcasts, internet access, books,…

Religion
2
Operation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation

Bring help and hope in the united states and around the world through programs that include hunger relief, medical care, clean water, child development and disaster relief.

International
3
Christian Freedom International Inc

Christian freedom international (cfi) aids, equips, and advocates for persecuted christians who are oppressed or persecuted for their faith. cfi provides spiritual and physical help for suffering christians to live in the dignity of god's…

Civil Rights
4
Imi Sos International

Our mission is to provide traditional churches with consultation, pastors and counseling.

Religion
5
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
6
Talking Bibles International

The distribution of Talking Bibles worldwide in as many different languages as possible.

Religion
7
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
8
Braille Bibles International

The mission of Braille Bibles International is to make a positive difference in the lives of visually impaired people by providing them access to God's Holy Word. Braille Bibles International provides Bibles in Braille, Large Print and…

Religion
9
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
10
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
11
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
12
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blessman International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Vermilion United Methodist Church: $97,500 · OtherVermilion United Methodist ChurchTMS GLOBAL INC: $55,000 · OtherTMS GLOBAL INCSALVATION ARMY: $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYOUR SAVIORS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherOUR SAVIORS LUTHERAN CHURCHOPEN DOORS USA: $15,000 · OtherOPEN DOORS USANACCC: $12,000 · Other+20 more: $33,607 · Other+20 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $62,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $16,000 · ReligionOpen Doors With Brother …MY KINSMEN MINISTRIES: $10,100 · ReligionMY KINSMEN MINISTRIES+1 more: $500 · ReligionRETRIEVING FREEDOM INC: $30,000 · AnimalsMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentDIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5,000 · Human ServicesCentral IA Center for Independent Living: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$258,107Religion$89,100Animals$30,000Health$20,100Environment$10,000Human Services$5,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $62,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRETRIEVING FREEDOM INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMY KINSMEN MINISTRIES: $10,100 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral IA Center for Independent Living: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOPEN THE BIBLE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSMAN INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds RETRIEVING FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc ↗
  • Who funds MY KINSMEN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds Central IA Center for Independent Living ↗
  • Who funds OPEN THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds BLESSMAN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideVA11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shirar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shirar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shirar Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph