· Public charity
Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Association Local 19
To organize and create an atmosphere of labor and management cooperation that will enhance prosperity for union employers, while, at the same time, insuring job security, safety, training, excellent wages, and benefits for its members.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19 ASSOCIATION LOCAL 19’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $67,646 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $334,808 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $267,162 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNION SPORTMEN'S ALLIANCE | $17,750 |
| THE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC | $15,000 |
| DOWNTOWN MECHANICAL LLC | $8,800 |
| PHILADELPHIA BUILDING TRADES CHARITY FUND | $8,500 |
| OLIVET BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $6,596 |
| THE POTTERS HOUSE | $5,500 |
| PHILLYLABORCOM | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMSELF-HELP MOVEMENT INC5× · 2017–2023 · $32k · revenue +79%
- SNSouthern NJ Development Council2× · 2021–2022 · $16k · revenue +1%
- SMSHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC2× · 2018–2019 · $12k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +21%
- APAFL-CIO PHILADELPHIA COUNCILone grant, 2019 · $17k · revenue +9%
- JHJEFFERSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +221%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
To support the charitable purposes, programs and services of saint peter's university hospital ("the hospital"); a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, which provides medically necessary healthcare…
Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.
Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.
Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.
We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.
The mutual protection and benefit of all its members.
The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jefferson Health - Northeast Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Southern Nj Development Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEFFERSON HEALTH - NORTHEAST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SELF-HELP MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds PEGGY BROWNING FUND ↗
- Who funds OLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA ↗
- Who funds LISAS ARMY INC ↗
- Who funds BLOSSOM PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds AFL-CIO PHILADELPHIA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Southern NJ Development Council ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INSPIRA HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION CUMBERLAND/SALEM INC ↗
- Who funds THE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BIANCA'S KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Potter's House Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE COOPER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
- Who funds ARVF CORPORATION THE ALICIA ROSE VICTORIOUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds KENNEDY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIVENGRIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA BUILDING TRADES CHARITY FUND ↗
- Who funds CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR GREATER PHILADEPHIA ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers #98 · Iupat District Council No 21 · International Union of Elevator Constructors · United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe · Oceanfirst Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · International Assn of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers · International Assn of Smart No 104 · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · The Nemours Foundation · The Wawa Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Association Local 19 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Delaware State Chamber of Commerce Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.