· Public charity
Iupat District Council No 21
The objects of iupat district council no.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $54,650 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $103,303 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $48,653 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JACK COSTELLO BOXING CLUB | $12,500 |
| ATLANTICARE FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| DRYWALL & INTERIOR SYSTEMS CONTRACT ASSN OF NJ INC IND PROMO FUND | $10,400 |
| PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATION FOR PROGRESS | $10,000 |
| SFTA FOUNDATION | $5,500 |
| UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE | $5,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAPAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDREN'S HOPE FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2022 · $141k · revenue +14%
- DADrywall and Interior Systems Contr ASSOC INC OF NJIPF3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +18%
- TSTHE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +102%
Funded once
- IDIUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 RALPH WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $174k · revenue +60% · 52% of their budget
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONgraduated2× · 2017–2018 · $43k · revenue +228%- BHBOBBY HENON LEGAL DEFENSE FUNDone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The objectives of the philadelphia building trades council are to enlist the voluntary cooperation and support of every eligible local union to the end that wage scales and desirable working conditions may be established and maintained in…
Labor union to support collective bargaining for its members, conducting membership meetings, education, organizing events to further the common interests of the membership.
The mutual protection and benefit of all its members.
Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…
The mission of the organization is to foster increased labor-management cooperation in southern pennsylvania, including bucks, chester, delaware, montgomery and philadelphia counties.
Promote the interest and welfare of the industry by recommending legislation to protect the trade.
The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…
Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Afl-Cio Philadelphia Council and the most unlike its peers is Philadelphia Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 RALPH WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDREN'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION ↗
- Who funds Drywall and Interior Systems Contr ASSOC INC OF NJIPF ↗
- Who funds CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds THE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds JACK COSTELLO BOXING CLUB ↗
- Who funds ATLANTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC - SUBORDINATES ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FORT FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds AFL-CIO PHILADELPHIA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Association Local 19 · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Iupat District Council No 21 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.