Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sgm Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$109kEnvironment$102kHealth$53kRecreation & Sports$51kInternational$47kArts & Culture$40kEducation$32kYouth Development$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $97k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$20,000
DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE$20,000
COMMON HOPE$17,000
HIGHLINE CANAL CONSERVANCY$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DENVER$10,000
LOVE LIGHT MELODY$10,000
EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST$10,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$5,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HOSPITAL$5,000
GREAT PLAINS FOUNDATION$5,000
DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$5,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF COLORADO$5,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$5,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LOVE LIGHT MELODY: $10k → 12%LOVE LIGHT MELODY: $8k → 12%LOVE LIGHT MELODY: $8k → 12%LOVE LIGHT MELODY: $2k → 12%LOVE LIGHT MELODY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$474k · 23 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
3

Total granted

$474k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+271%

Still filing today

61%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +41%
  • EV
    EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +41%
  • LL
    LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • DD
    DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +271%
  • TB
    THE BUTTERFLY CHILDREN FUND CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +76%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
2
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
3
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
4
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
5
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
6
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
11
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League; the most unlike its peers is Humble Design Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONNATIONAL JEWISH HOSPITAL: $45,000 · OtherNATIONAL JEWISH HOSPITALTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $27,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INCHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $20,000 · OtherHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $12,000 · OtherGREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherThe Trustees of Princeton University: $16,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $12,000 · Other+11 more: $35,558 · Other+11 moreCOMMON HOPE: $47,000 · InternationalCOMMON HOP…Colorado Museum of Natural History: $30,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNorthwestern University: $39,500 · Recreation & SportsEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $37,000 · EnvironmentLOVE LIGHT AND MELODY: $29,000 · Human ServicesVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Community Improvement
Other$312,058International$47,000Arts & Culture$40,000Recreation & Sports$39,500Environment$37,000Human Services$29,000Community Improvement$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMON HOPE: $47,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $39,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $37,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE LIGHT AND MELODY: $29,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLY CONSORTIUM: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN STATES CANCER RESEARCH NCORP: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMON HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLY CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds Humble Design Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN STATES CANCER RESEARCH NCORP ↗
  • Who funds THE BUTTERFLY CHILDREN FUND CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sgm Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sgm Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sgm Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph