Skip to content

· Private foundation

Selden F Von Herten Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Animals$190kHealth$170kYouth Development$135kRecreation & Sports$75kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP SUNSHINE$25,000
ANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND$25,000
CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN$25,000
RIDING TO THE TOP$25,000
WOLFE'S NECK CENTER$25,000
PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY$15,000
MAINE MARITIME MUSEUM$15,000
TREE STREET YOUTH$10,000
ARK PET SHELTER$5,000
MIDCOAST HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
PAWS BRAVE HEART$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIDING TO THE TOP: $25k → 7%RIDING TO THE TOP: $25k → 7%RIDING TO THE TOP: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$595k · 11 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$595k
$5k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    RIDING TO THE TOP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +99%
  • CS
    CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +78%
  • PR
    PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • H
    HART
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Rescue League of New Hampshire

Helping pets and the people that care for them.

—
2
Penobscot Valley Humane Society

Rescue and re-adoption of dogs and cats.

—
3
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
4
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
5
Maine GearShare

To provide access to outdoor gear and know-how through a collaborative, equity-centered approach.

Recreation & Sports
6
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
7
Maine Media College

Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…

—
8
Cumberland Valley Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty

Animals
9
Waypoint Maine Inc

Waypoint Maine provides a comprehensive array of programs that each year provides essential services and support to over 1,000 children and adults with special needs.

Human Services
10
Barn Sanctuary

Rescue farmed animals and inspire people to embrace a plant-based lifestyle.

Animals
11
Marine Mammals of Maine

To rescue injured, sick and abandoned marine mammals and to educate the public about what to do if they find one of these marine mammals.

Arts & Culture
12
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children; the most unlike its peers is Paws Brave Hearts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND: $75,000 · AnimalsANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GRE…PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $55,000 · AnimalsPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARYPaws Brave Hearts: $20,000 · AnimalsPaws Brave HeartsWOLFE'S NECK CENTER: $95,000 · OtherWOLFE'S NECK CENTERARK PET SHELTER: $25,000 · OtherARK PET SHELTERMIDCOAST HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,000 · OtherMIDCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYHART: $5,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $95,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING …TREE STREET YOUTH INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREE STREET YOUTH INCRIDING TO THE TOP: $75,000 · Human ServicesRIDING TO THE…CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE…TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public BenefitMaine Maritime Museum: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Animals$150,000Other$140,000Youth Development$135,000Human Services$75,000Recreation & Sports$75,000Public Benefit$25,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $95,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRIDING TO THE TOP: $75,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $55,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTREE STREET YOUTH INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPaws Brave Hearts: $20,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds RIDING TO THE TOP ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds TREE STREET YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Paws Brave Hearts ↗
  • Who funds Maine Maritime Museum ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Selden F Von Herten Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Selden F Von Herten Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Selden F Von Herten’s filings →

    More from the funding graph