Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Selden F Von Herten Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Animals$190kHealth$170kYouth Development$135kRecreation & Sports$75kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN$25,000
CAMP SUNSHINE$25,000
RIDING TO THE TOP$25,000
WOLFE'S NECK CENTER$25,000
ANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND$25,000
MAINE MARITIME MUSEUM$15,000
PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY$15,000
TREE STREET YOUTH$10,000
ARK PET SHELTER$5,000
MIDCOAST HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
PAWS BRAVE HEART$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIDING TO THE TOP: $25k → 7%RIDING TO THE TOP: $25k → 7%RIDING TO THE TOP: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$595k · 11 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$595k
$5k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    RIDING TO THE TOP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +99%
  • CS
    CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +78%
  • PR
    PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • H
    HART
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Rescue League of New Hampshire

Helping pets and the people that care for them.

2
Penobscot Valley Humane Society

Rescue and re-adoption of dogs and cats.

3
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
4
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
5
Maine GearShare

To provide access to outdoor gear and know-how through a collaborative, equity-centered approach.

Recreation & Sports
6
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
7
Maine Media College

Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…

8
Cumberland Valley Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty

Animals
9
Waypoint Maine Inc

Waypoint Maine provides a comprehensive array of programs that each year provides essential services and support to over 1,000 children and adults with special needs.

Human Services
10
Barn Sanctuary

Rescue farmed animals and inspire people to embrace a plant-based lifestyle.

Animals
11
Marine Mammals of Maine

To rescue injured, sick and abandoned marine mammals and to educate the public about what to do if they find one of these marine mammals.

Arts & Culture
12
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Paws Brave Hearts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND — $75,000 · AnimalsANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GRE…PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY — $55,000 · AnimalsPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARYPaws Brave Hearts — $20,000 · AnimalsPaws Brave HeartsWOLFE'S NECK CENTER — $95,000 · OtherWOLFE'S NECK CENTERARK PET SHELTER — $25,000 · OtherARK PET SHELTERMIDCOAST HUMANE SOCIETY — $15,000 · OtherMIDCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYHART — $5,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN — $95,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING …TREE STREET YOUTH INC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREE STREET YOUTH INCRIDING TO THE TOP — $75,000 · Human ServicesRIDING TO THE…CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $75,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE…TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Public BenefitMaine Maritime Museum — $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Animals$150,000Other$140,000Youth Development$135,000Human Services$75,000Recreation & Sports$75,000Public Benefit$25,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN — $95,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND — $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRIDING TO THE TOP — $75,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY — $55,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTREE STREET YOUTH INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPaws Brave Hearts — $20,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN
  • Who funds ANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND
  • Who funds RIDING TO THE TOP
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC
  • Who funds PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY
  • Who funds TREE STREET YOUTH INC
  • Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Paws Brave Hearts
  • Who funds Maine Maritime Museum

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Selden F Von Herten Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph