Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seiberlich Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$444kHealth$214kReligion$135kInternational$50kEducation$49kCrime & Legal$34kHousing & Shelter$28kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $107k
$6,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$254k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 90% of reported assets are held in United Healthcare.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$57,000
HOPE 4 TANZANIA$50,000
STILLWATER LIBRARY$20,000
MS SOCIETY$15,000
FISHER HOUSE$13,500
PARK NICOLET FOUNDATION$13,500
K9 WARRIORS$12,000
AMERICA WALKS$6,000
RUNNING REBELS$6,000
BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
STREET ANGELS$6,000
TORINO GRACE HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
UNDERDOG RESCUE$5,000
ST ODILIA SCHOOL$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK: $8k → 12%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $6k → 10%STREET ANGELS: $7k → 17%STREET ANGELS: $6k → 17%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $30k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MA
CT
CA
KY
MD
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$606k · 11 repeat orgs$589k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
16

Total granted

$606k
$451k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+32%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthCivil RightsFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $174k
  • SM
    ST MICHAELS CHURCH
    2× · 2018–2019 · $120k
  • P4
    PARTNERS 4 HOPE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k

Funded once

  • OF
    OPTIONS FOR WOMEN
    one grant, 2018 · $280k
  • DC
    DAKOTA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
    one grant, 2024 · $34k
  • SB
    SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Taskforce Fore Ending Homelessness Inc

To get our neighbors experiencing homelessness off the street through proactive outreach and services and provide placement in a program that will help them get "home."

Human Services
2
Pathways to Housing - Pa

Pathways to housing pa empowers people with disabilities to improve their housing stability, achieve better health, and reclaim their lives.

Housing & Shelter
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Usvets - Texas

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
5
Wounded Veterans Relief Fund Inc

Wounded veterans relief fund (wvrf), founded in 2009, is a veteran-led 501 (c)(3) nonprofit organization. our mission is to provide urgent financial assistance and critical dental care to florida's eligible wounded and disabled veterans.…

Human Services
6
Usvets - Arizona

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Housing & Shelter
7
Michigan Veterans Foundations Inc

Provides at risk, and homeless veterans with temporary housing and supportive services, e.g., medical, vocational, psychological, and educational training to regain or improve their status in society.

—
8
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
9
Fresh Start Foundation

Provide a clean and sober environment for individuals without a place to live in the community while receiving substance abuse treatment in a licensed outpatient, intensive outpatient or partial hospitalization program.

Health
10
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
11
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
12
Veterans Housing Development Corporation

The specific charitable and public purposes for which the corporation is organized is to support the mission of nation's finest by providing affordable housing - permanent supportive, transitional, rental and ownership - for low income…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bridge to Brighter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $280,000 · OtherOPTIONS FOR WOMENIndividual grant recipient: $174,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST MICHAELS CHURCH: $120,000 · OtherST MICHAELS CHURCHPARTNERS 4 HOPE: $100,000 · OtherPARTNERS 4 HOPEVETERANS ON THE LAKE RESORT: $89,400 · OtherVETERANS ON THE LAKE RESORTHOPE 4 TANZANIA: $50,000 · OtherMS SOCIETY: $39,500 · Other+18 more: $236,900 · Other+18 moreSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $30,000 · Human ServicesSTREET ANGELS INC: $12,800 · Human ServicesNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $4,850 · Human ServicesTHE DREAM FACTORY INC: $8,000 · HealthTREVOR PROJECT INC: $8,000 · Civil RightsUNDERDOG RESCUE INC: $7,500 · AnimalsAmerica Walks Inc: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,089,800Human Services$66,650Health$8,000Civil Rights$8,000Animals$7,500Recreation & Sports$6,000Youth Development$6,000Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVETERANS ON THE LAKE RESORT: $89,400 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $30,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSTREET ANGELS INC: $12,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $11,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DREAM FACTORY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERDOG RESCUE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $4,850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Sarasota Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VETERANS ON THE LAKE RESORT ↗
  • Who funds SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STREET ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DREAM FACTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNDERDOG RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds America Walks Inc ↗
  • Who funds RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity Sarasota Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI14.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seiberlich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seiberlich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seiberlich Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph