Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Seaview Lutheran Plaza Inc

On july 31,2021, the organization sold the housing project and proceeds from sale ofproperty will be used to further the mission of the associated church.

$2.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Religion$5.8MEducation$865kHousing & Shelter$150kHuman Services$129kHealth$128kInternational$35kRecreation & Sports$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $748k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
$25,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHER HOUSE OF STUDY$1,310,000
LUTHERAN CHURCH OF MASTER$673,220
REHOBOTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$200,000
NEW REFORMATION PUBLICATIONS$160,000
GRANDVIEW UNIVERSITY$110,000
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$100,000
ST PAUL LUTHERAN SEMINARY$75,000
SEEDS CHRISTIAN COUNSELING$52,500
CHARITY ON WHEELS$50,000
GROUND UP GRACE$25,000
BREAST CANCER ANGELS$25,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOSPICE$25,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF S$23,850
ATONEMENT LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,000
CONFESSIONAL LUTHERAN SYNOD$11,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOSPICE: $25k → 10%ST PAUL LUTHERAN SEMINARY: $75k → 5%HUMAN OPTIONS INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
NY
SD
IA
PA
CA
MO
MD
NM
TN
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.8M · 8 repeat orgs$434k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$6.8M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+4%

Still filing today

88%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $365k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesReligionHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LUTHER HOUSE OF STUDY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +19% · 97% of their budget
  • RC
    Rehoboth Christian School Assoc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $525k · revenue +16%
  • NR
    NEW REFORMATION PUBLICATIONS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $360k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • RF
    RAINFOREST FLOWgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +26%
  • PO
    Parish of Calvary Holy Communion and St Georges in
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Luther Classical College

Luther classical college educates lutherans in the classical, lutheran tradition and prepares them for godly vocations within family, church, and society, fostering christian culture through study of the best of our western heritage.

Education
3
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
4
Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge

Witnessing to god's love for all people, we stand with and advocate for migrants and refugees, transforming communities through ministries of service and justice.

5
Faith Evangelical Lutheran Seminary Faith International University

Faith evangelical seminary exists to glorify god by equipping christian leaders with a biblical, theological, and practical education empowering them to apply and proclaim the inerrant word of god for world-wide christian service.

Education
6
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
7
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

8
Lutheran Social Services of the South Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of child abuse by empowering children, families and communities.

Human Services
9
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
10
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
11
Crossroads Christian Counseling

Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.

Human Services
12
Global Lutheran Outreach Inc

To serve the worldwide lutheran community by sending lutherans as transnational missionaries to establish and strengthen congregations and ministries around the world.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran World Relief Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lutheran Theological Seminary Henry Grove. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHospice Care ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Youth CampsChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%18%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%66%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 66% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUTHER HOUSE OF STUDY — $3,222,500 · EducationLUTHER HOUSE OF STUDYRehoboth Christian School Assoc — $525,000 · EducationRehoboth Christian School AssocGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY — $330,000 · EducationGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITYLUTHERAN CHURCH OF MASTER — $2,063,220 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCH OF MASTERLUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY HENRY GROVE — $100,000 · Other+11 more — $153,500 · Other+11 moreNEW REFORMATION PUBLICATIONS — $360,000 · ReligionGROUND UP GRACE INC — $25,000 · ReligionCharity On Wheels Inc — $150,000 · Housing & ShelterCharity Navigator — $75,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOSPICE FOUNDAT ATTN MICHELLE WULFESTIEG — $25,000 · Human ServicesHuman Options Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesSEEDS CHRISTIAN COUNSELING — $77,500 · HealthBREAST CANCER ANGELS — $25,000 · HealthRAINFOREST FLOW — $25,000 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $10,170 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 · International
Education$4,077,500Other$2,316,720Religion$385,000Housing & Shelter$150,000Human Services$110,000Health$102,500International$45,170

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUTHER HOUSE OF STUDY — $3,222,500 over 3y, 97% of budgetRehoboth Christian School Assoc — $525,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetNEW REFORMATION PUBLICATIONS — $360,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY — $330,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCharity On Wheels Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetSEEDS CHRISTIAN COUNSELING — $77,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetCharity Navigator — $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRAINFOREST FLOW — $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetRAD CAMP INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGROUND UP GRACE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBREAST CANCER ANGELS — $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOSPICE FOUNDAT ATTN MICHELLE WULFESTIEG — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $23,850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $10,170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Options Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN QUARTERLY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetSOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seaview Lutheran Plaza Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seaview Lutheran Plaza Inc?

Find your warmest path to Seaview Lutheran Plaza Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph