Skip to content
Schoenheimer Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Schoenheimer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$400kHealth$56kInternational$53kSocial Science$50kArts & Culture$36kFood & Nutrition$33kHuman Services$19kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$988k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC$60,000
MYRIAD USA$10,000
HAWAII FOOD BANK$5,000
MONTAUK FOOD PANTRY$5,000
SAG HARBOR COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$5,000
THE ART THERAPY PROJECT$2,500
TECH KIDS UNLIMITED$1,500
SHARE HOPE INC$1,500
CONGREGATION SOF MA'ARAV$1,000
MUSEUM OF MODERM ART$600
JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES$500
METROPLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$210
LONGHOUSE RESERVE$175
NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN$175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
TN
DC
HI
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$550k · 25 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
29

Total granted

$550k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+40%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +94%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $36k · revenue +86%
  • HF
    HAWAII FOODBANK INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • WI
    WEIZMANN INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -51%
  • IT
    ISMMS THE CGD CENTER FOR MS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
5
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Jewish Food Society Inc

Jewish food society works to preserve and celebrate jewish culinary heritage from around the world in order to increase awareness and deepen connections to jewish life. jfs is committed to showcasing the diversity of the jewish experience,…

Arts & Culture
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
12
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Art Therapy Project Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Montauk Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMAN: $240,000 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANWEIZMANN INSTITUTE: $50,000 · OtherWEIZMANN INSTITUTEALIVE ART FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherMONTAUK PLAYHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER: $12,600 · Other+33 more: $43,330 · Other+33 moreAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $160,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADO…MYRIAD USA INC: $18,090 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCSHARE HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · International+1 more: $2,750 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTER: $36,000 · HealthMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · HealthHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $14,526 · Food & NutritionSAG HARBOR COMM FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionMONTAUK FOOD PANTRY: $7,500 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ART THERAPY PROJECT CORPORATION: $13,085 · Arts & CultureJEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art: $2,710 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $755 · Arts & CultureICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $5,000 · EducationLONGHOUSE RESERVE: $475 · EducationNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $2,275 · EnvironmentPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $2,000 · Environment
Other$360,930International$215,340Health$39,500Food & Nutrition$33,026Arts & Culture$19,550Education$5,475Environment$4,275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $160,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTER: $36,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $18,090 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $14,526 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART THERAPY PROJECT CORPORATION: $13,085 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSAG HARBOR COMM FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSHARE HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMONTAUK FOOD PANTRY: $7,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $2,710 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $2,275 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MONTAUK LIBRARY: $1,700 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF HAWAII: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEACE 4 KIDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $570 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONGHOUSE RESERVE: $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTIST COMMUNITIES ALLIANCE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $185 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART THERAPY PROJECT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SAG HARBOR COMM FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTAUK FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MONTAUK LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds PEACE 4 KIDS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Paypal Charitable Giv…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY14× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schoenheimer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schoenheimer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schoenheimer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home