· Public charity
Scentsy Family Foundation Inc
SCENTSY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ('scentsy foundation') was formed primarily to provide support to children and strengthen families by providing grant funding to section 501(c)(3) nonprofits and other community-based organizations that address critical needs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $112,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $186,207 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $73,707 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOURTH AND GOLD | $7,500 |
| PRINCESS HAILEY'S HOPE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| COURAGEOUS KIDZ | $7,500 |
| ELLE'S ANGELS FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| BRAVE LIKE MCKENNA FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| TEAM JACK FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| JOURNEY LIKE JUNE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| TOUGH2GETHER | $7,500 |
| CARE CAMPS FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| HOPE FOR MIRACLES | $7,500 |
| FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER | $7,500 |
| SARA'S ACTS OF KINDNESS | $7,500 |
| CAMP RAINBOW GOLD | $7,500 |
| CANDLELIGHTERS CHILDHOOD CANCER FAM | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To meet the well-being of women who are in mental, and psychological need of support. to help women dealing with, recovering from or diagnosed with cancer who are in need of the support of other survivors. as well as helping women who…
The Virginia Breast Cancer Foundation (VBCF) empowers Virginians impacted by breast cancer through access, advocacy, education, and community action.
To create awareness of hereditary breast and gynecological cancer and provide personalized support to individuals at risk.
To provide social services to breast cancer victims and their families. consultations to breast cancer victims to inform them on different support networks.
Helping women with cancer
Share cancer support is a national, peer-led nonprofit organization that supports and educates anyone who has been diagnosed with breast or gynecologic cancer and provides critical information to the general public about signs, symptoms,…
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
Increasing research into the cause, treatment and cure of breast cancer; improving access for all women to high quality breast cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment; and encouraging other areas to conduct mapping and surveys to help…
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
To promote breast cancer recovery for survivors and their families so that they can focus on healing, reconnecting, and celebrating life. cancer is physically, emotionally, and financially exhausting which is at the heart of our mission-…
Provide immediate direct financial and emotional support to patients undergoing breast cancer treatment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Referral Agency Inc and the most unlike its peers is Future Hope and Healing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds Education Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds HERE FOR THE GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds The Breasties Inc ↗
- Who funds PINK RIBBON GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds The Kids Mental Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CINDY'S FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PINK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds CUYAHOGA FALLS SCHOOLS ALUMNI FNDN ↗
- Who funds GLORIA GEMMA BREAST CANCER RESOURCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Its a Breast Thing Inc ↗
- Who funds PRETTY IN PINK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Unite for HER ↗
- Who funds WYOMING BREAST CANCER INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds CHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds BUTTERFLY HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds PINK BANDANA ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CASA ↗
- Who funds THE GRAY MATTERS COLLECTIVE NFP ↗
- Who funds Project Pinkd Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK OF CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS ↗
- Who funds The Donna Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds STOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC ↗
- Who funds Third District Guardian Ad Litem Program ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds Coyote Hill Foster Care Ministries ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mary Kay Ash Foundation · T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics Foundation · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Edward Jones Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Scentsy Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Programs for People Inc — 59% of income from government
- Help Now of Osceola Inc — 48% of income from government
- Mccall Foundation Inc — 41% of income from government
- Hope Family Services Inc — 40% of income from government
- Northeast Kingdom Human Services Inc — 8% of income from government
- Everymind Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.