Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES

PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES (Texas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $193,531 to it, the largest being THRIVE CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION ($138,586). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$313k
Revenue FY2024
7
Funders on record
$194k
Grants received
$485k
Net assets
1/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%

Against its field

PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−6% · below the median
Months of reserve2.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,726 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($436k) Expenses 100 ($212k) Net assets 100 ($224k)2020 Revenue 50 ($218k) Expenses 82 ($173k) Net assets 120 ($269k)2021 Revenue 58 ($254k) Expenses 90 ($190k) Net assets 149 ($333k)2022 Revenue 96 ($420k) Expenses 145 ($307k) Net assets 192 ($431k)2023 Revenue 87 ($379k) Expenses 155 ($329k) Net assets 220 ($493k)2024 Revenue 72 ($313k) Expenses 157 ($333k) Net assets 217 ($485k)
201920202021202220232024
Revenue (72)Expenses (157)Net assets (217)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 12% · 2023 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

7% of PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,844 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$224k
19
$45k
20
$64k
21
$113k
22
$50k
23
$20k
24
2.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $169 → $31k.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

27% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES.

72%
largest funder
90%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 88% · 2022 97% · 2023 64%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES draws 88% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 3 states in all.

WA
ID
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $12k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 9%Fundraising 1%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES?
PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES (Texas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $193,531 to it, the largest being THRIVE CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION ($138,586). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $193,531 in grants to PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES?
THRIVE CAUSEMETICS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $138,586 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing